MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Tayalisi 675

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو دَاوُدَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنِ الْحَكَمِ، سَمِعَ ذَرَّ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللهِ يُحَدِّثُ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَى، عَنْ أَبِيهِ قَالَ:

أَتَى رَجُلٌ عُمَرَ فَذَكَرَ أَنَّهُ كَانَ فِي سَفَرٍ، فَأَجْنَبَ وَلَمْ يَجِدِ الْمَاءَ، فَقَالَ: لَا يُصَلِّي، فَقَالَ عَمَّارٌ: أَمَا تَذْكُرُ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذْ كُنْتُ أَنَا وَأَنْتَ فِي سَرِيَّةٍ فَأَجْنَبْنَا فَلَمْ نَجِدِ الْمَاءَ، فَأَمَّا أَنْتَ فَلَمْ تُصَلِّ، وَأَمَّا أَنَا فَتَمَعَّكْتُ فِي التُّرَابِ وَصَلَّيْتُ، فَلَمَّا قَدِمْنَا عَلَى رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ ذَكَرْنَا ذَلِكَ لَهُ، فَقَالَ لَكَ: أَمَّا أَنْتَ فَلَمْ يَكُنْ يَنْبَغِي لَكَ أَنْ تَدَعَ الصَّلَاةَ، وَأَمَّا أَنْتَ يَا عَمَّارُ فَلَمْ يَكُنْ يَنْبَغِي لَكَ أَنْ تَمَعَّكَ كَمَا تَتَمَعَّكُ الدَّابَّةُ، إِنَّمَا كَانَ يُجْزِئُكَ - وَضَرَبَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ بِيَدِهِ الْأَرْضَ إِلَى التُّرَابِ ثُمَّ قَالَ هَكَذَا، فَنَفَخَ فِيهَا وَمَسَحَ وَجْهَهُ وَيَدَيْهِ إِلَى الْمِفْصَلِ، وَلَيْسَ فِيهِ " الذِّرَاعَيْنِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Abū Dāwud
  2. Shuʿbah
  3. al-Ḥakam
  4. Dhar b. ʿAbdullāh Yuḥaddith
  5. Ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. Abzá
  6. his father

✧ A man came to ‘Umar and mentioned that he had been on a journey, became junub, and could not find water. He said: 'He should not pray.' ‘Ammar said: 'Do you not remember, O Commander of the Faithful, when you and I were on a military expedition and we became junub and could not find water? As for you, you did not pray, but as for me, I rolled in the dust and prayed. When we came to the Messenger of God ﷺ, we mentioned that to him. He said to you: "As for you, it was not appropriate for you to abandon the prayer. As for you, O ‘Ammar, it was not appropriate for you to roll as an animal rolls. It would have sufficed you"—and the Messenger of God ﷺ struck the ground with his hand to the dust, then said: "like this," and he blew on it and wiped his face and hands up to the wrist, and it does not include the forearms.'

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Taḥāwī

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in مسند الطيالسي, p. 675
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    حديث عمار فورد بذكر الكفين في الصحيحين وبذكر المرفقين في السنن وفي رواية إلى نصف الذراع وفي رواية إلى الآباط فأما رواية المرفقين وكذا نصف الذراع ففيهما مقال وأما رواية الآباط فقال الشافعي وغيره مما تقدم ذكره مرارا ومما يقوي رواية الصحيحين في الاقتصار على الوجه والكفين

    machine translationAs for the hadith of ʿAmmār, it came with mention of the two palms in the two Ṣaḥīḥs, with mention of the elbows in the Sunan, in one narration up to half the forearm, and in another up to the armpits. The narrations of the elbows and likewise of half the forearm are open to criticism. As for the narration of the armpits, al-Shāfiʿī and others said what has been mentioned many times before. Among what strengthens the narration of the two Ṣaḥīḥs is that it limits tayammum to the face and the two palms.

    in مسند الطيالسي, p. 675
  • Badr al-Dīn al-ʿAynī

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in مسند الطيالسي, p. 675
  • أبو الحسنات اللكنوي

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in مسند الطيالسي, p. 675

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. eminent, well-known Companion, among the earliest to embrace Islamd. 37 AH
    عَمَّار بْن يَاسِرصحابي جليل مشهور من السابقين الأولين
    فقال
  2. Young Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 70-odd AH
    أَبِيهِصحابي صغير
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 91 AH and 100 AH
    ابْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَىثقة
    يحدث عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. before the year 100 AH
    ذَرَّ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللهِثقة عابد
    سمع
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), except that he sometimes practised concealment (tadlīs)d. 113 AH, or 114 AH, or 115; also said 110 AH
    الْحَكَمِثقة ثبت فقيه ، إلا أنه ربما دلس
    عن
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    حدثنا
  7. trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), who erred in some hadithsd. 203 AH, or 204 AH
    أَبُو دَاوُدَثقة حافظ , غلط في أحاديث

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us