MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Matalib al-'Aliyah 2465

✧ Clarification that additional spoils were common property for whoever took them before the division was made

Show the chain

قَالَ إِسْحَاقُ: أَخْبَرَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ آدَمَ، نَا يَحْيَى بْنُ أَبِي زَائِدَةَ، عَنِ الْمُجَالِدِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ زِيَادِ بْنِ عِلَاقَةَ، عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ أَبِي وَقَّاصٍ ؓ، قَالَ:

لَمَّا قَدِمَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ الْمَدِينَةَ بَعَثَنَا وَأَمَرَنَا أَنْ نُغِيرَ عَلَى حَيٍّ مِنْ كِنَانَةَ، وَكَانَ الْفَيْءُ إِذْ ذَاكَ: مَنْ أَخَذَ شَيْئًا فَهُوَ لَهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Isḥāq
  2. Yaḥyá b. Ādam
  3. Yaḥyá b. Abū Zāʾidah
  4. al-Mujālid b. Saʿīd
  5. Ziyād b. ʿIlāqah
  6. Saʿd b. Abū Waqqāṣ

✧ When the Messenger of God ﷺ came to Madinah, he sent us out and commanded us to raid a tribe of Kinanah. The fay' at that time was: whoever took something, it was his.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the Ten (promised Paradise), and the first to shoot an arrow in the path of Godd. 50 AH or 51 AH or 54 AH, also said: 56 AH, also said: 57 AH, also said: 58 AH. And the second is better known
    سَعْد بْن أَبِي وَقَّاصأحد العشرة ، وأول من رمى بسهم في سبيل الله
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 135 AH, also said: 125 AH or shortly after it
    زِيَادِ بْنِ عِلَاقَةَثقة
    عن
  3. Not strong (laysa bi-l-qawī), and he changed (taghayyara) at the end of his life.d. 144 AH, also said: 143 AH
    الْمُجَالِدِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍليس بالقوي ، وقد تغير في آخر عمره
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), meticulous (mutqin)d. 183, also said 180 AH, also said: 182 AH, also said: 184 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنُ أَبِي زَائِدَةَثقة متقن
    نا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), virtuous (fāḍil)d. 203 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنُ آدَمَثقة حافظ فاضل
    أخبرنا
  6. trustworthy, a memorizer, a mujtahid (thiqah ḥāfiẓ mujtahid)d. 237 AH, or 238 AH
    إِسْحَاقُثقة حافظ مجتهد

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us