MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 17363

✧ The collective chapters on amputation of the hand and foot for theft

Show the chain

17363 -

وَأَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو الْحَسَنِ، أَنْبَأَ الْحَسَنُ، أَنْبَأَ يُوسُفُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ، ثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ، ثَنَا عُمَرُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، ثَنَا حَجَّاجُ بْنُ أَرْطَاةَ، عَنْ مَكْحُولٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ مُحَيْرِيزٍ قَالَ: قُلْتُ لِفَضَالَةَ بْنِ عُبَيْدٍ، وَكَانَ مِمَّنْ بَايَعَ تَحْتَ الشَّجَرَةِ. ثُمَّ ذَكَرَ مِثْلَهُ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. The first (battle) he attended was Uḥudd. Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī and more than one said: 53 AH. Ibn Ḥajar said: 58 AH. Also said: 67 AH
    فَضَالَة بْن عُبَيْد بْن نَافِذ الْأَوْسِيأول ما شهد شهد أحدا
    قلت
  2. Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him among the trustworthy Successorsd. between 91 and 100 AH
    عبد الرحمن بن محيريز الجمحيذكره ابن حبان في ثقات التابعين
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), frequently narrating with omission of the Companion (kathīr al-irsāl), well-known (mashhūr)d. 112 AH, or: 113 AH, or: 114 AH, or: 116 AH, Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus said: it is said 118 AH
    مكحول بن أبي مسلمثقة فقيه ، كثير الإرسال ، مشهور
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq), who made many errors and practiced much concealment (tadlīs)d. 145 AH, or before it, or 147 AH
    حجاج بن أرطاةصدوق كثير الخطأ والتدليس
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), but he practiced tadlīs severelyd. 189 AH, or 190 AH, or 192 AH
    عمر بن علي بن عطاءثقة ، وكان يدلس شديدا
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 234 AH
    محمد بن أبي بكر المقدميثقة
    حدثنا
  7. يوسف القاضي ابن حماد بن زيد بن درهم
    أنبأ
  8. الحسن بن محمد بن إسحاق الإسفراييني
    أنبأ
  9. علي بن محمد بن علي الإسفرائيني
    أخبرنا
  10. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us