MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan an-Nasa'i 3925

Mentioning The Differing Hadiths Regarding The Prohibition Of Leasing Out Land In Return For One Third, Or One Quarter Of The Harvest And The Different Wordings Reported By The Narrators

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا شُعَيْبُ بْنُ اللَّيْثِ عَنِ اللَّيْثِ عَنْ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ رَبِيعَةَ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ هُرْمُزَ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أُسَيْدَ بْنَ رَافِعِ بْنِ خَدِيجٍ الأَنْصَارِيَّ يَذْكُرُ

أَنَّهُمْ مَنَعُوا الْمُحَاقَلَةَ وَهِيَ أَرْضٌ تُزْرَعُ عَلَى بَعْضِ مَا فِيهَا

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. al-Rabīʿ b. Sulaymān
  2. Shuʿayb b. al-Layth
  3. al-Layth
  4. Jaʿfar b. Rabīʿah
  5. ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. Hurmuz
  6. Usayd b. Rāfiʿ b. Khadīj al-Anṣārī Yadhkur

"I heard Usaid bin Rafi' bin Khadij Al-Ansari say that they did not allow Al-Muhaqalah, which is land that is cultivated in return for some of its produce."

Notes

  • رَوَاهُ عِيسَى بْنُ سَهْلِ بْنِ رَافِعٍ

Grades by grader

Zubair Ali ZaiSoundhadithunlocked, sunnah.com
al-AlbaniSound Chainin صحيح سنن النسائي, p. 3935hadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. acceptable (maqbūl)
    أُسَيْدُ بْنُ رَافِعٍ الْأَنْصَارِيُّمقبول
    سمعت
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a scholar (ʿālim)d. 110 AH, or 117 AH, 119 AH
    عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ هُرْمُزَثقة ثبت عالم
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 136 AH or 135 AH, also said: 132 AH, also said: 133 AH or: after it, also said: 134 AH
    حَفْصِ بْنِ رَبِيعَةَثقة
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), a well-known imamd. 175 AH, or 176 AH, or 177 AH
    اللَّيْثِثقة ثبت ، فقيه إمام مشهور
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), noble, a juristd. 199 AH, Ibrāhīm b. Naṣr said: 180 AH
    شُعَيْبُ بْنُ اللَّيْثِثقة نبيل فقيه
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 270 AH
    الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَثقة
    أخبرنا
  7. the preserver (al-Ḥāfiẓ)d. 302 AH, or 303 AH
    النَّسَائِيُّالحافظ

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us