MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Matalib al-'Aliyah 2635

✧ The rebuke of false testimony and of concealing true testimony

Show the chain

وَقَالَ الْحَارِثُ [أَيْضًا]: حَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللهِ، ثَنَا الْمُعْتَمِرُ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ حَنَشٍ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ؓ، قَالَ:

مَنْ شَهِدَ شَهَادَةً اسْتَبَاحَ بِهَا مَالَ امْرِئٍ مُسْلِمٍ أَوْ سَفَكَ بِهَا دَمَهُ، فَقَدِ اسْتَوْجَبَ النَّارَ "

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. al-Ḥārith Ayḍ
  2. ʿUbaydullāh
  3. al-Muʿtamir
  4. his father
  5. Ḥanash
  6. ʿIkrimah
  7. Ibn ʿAbbās

✧ Whoever gives testimony by which he makes lawful the property of a Muslim or sheds his blood has made himself deserving of the Fire."

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr

    وهذا حديث وإن كان في إسناده من لا يحتج بمثله أيضا من أجل حنش هذا فإن معناه صحيح من وجوه

    machine translationEven though this hadith has in its chain someone whose like is not taken as proof, because of this Ḥanash, its meaning is nevertheless sound in several respects.

    in المطالب العالية, p. 2635
  • Mubarakpūri

    معلول بحنش

    machine translationDefective (maʿlūl) because of Ḥanash.

    in المطالب العالية, p. 2635
  • العقيلي

    ليس لهذا الحديث أصل

    machine translationThis hadith has no basis (aṣl).

    in المطالب العالية, p. 2635

Same hadith, other wordings

  • Al-Mathalib al-'Aliyah 2637وَحَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ هُوَ الْقَوَارِيرِيُّ، عَنْ مُعْتَمِرٍ، مِثْلَهُ

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
    عِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
    عن
  3. abandoned (matrūk)d. between 121 and 130 AH
    حَنَشٍمتروك
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 143 AH, or 144 AH
    أَبِيهِثقة عابد
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 186 AH, or: 187 AH, or: 188 AH
    الْمُعْتَمِرُثقة
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 233 AH or 234 AH or 235 AH
    عُبَيْدُ اللهِثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  7. d. 279 AH or 282 AH
    الْحَارِثُ

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us