MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan Ibn Majah 569

What was narrated of dry ablution with one strike

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ عَنِ الْحَكَمِ عَنْ ذَرٍّ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَى عَنْ أَبِيهِ

أَنَّ رَجُلاً أَتَى عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ فَقَالَ إِنِّي أَجْنَبْتُ فَلَمْ أَجِدِ الْمَاءَ فَقَالَ عُمَرُ لاَ تُصَلِّ فَقَالَ عَمَّارُ بْنُ يَاسِرٍ أَمَا تَذْكُرُ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذْ أَنَا وَأَنْتَ فِي سَرِيَّةٍ فَأَجْنَبْنَا فَلَمْ نَجِدِ الْمَاءَ فَأَمَّا أَنْتَ فَلَمْ تُصَلِّ وَأَمَّا أَنَا فَتَمَعَّكْتُ فِي التُّرَابِ فَصَلَّيْتُ فَلَمَّا أَتَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ فَذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لَهُ فَقَالَ إِنَّمَا كَانَ يَكْفِيكَ وَضَرَبَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ بِيَدَيْهِ إِلَى الأَرْضِ ثُمَّ نَفَخَ فِيهِمَا وَمَسَحَ بِهِمَا وَجْهَهُ وَكَفَّيْهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Bashhār
  2. Muḥammad b. Jaʿfar
  3. Shuʿbah
  4. al-Ḥakam
  5. Dhar
  6. Saʿīd b. ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. Abzá
  7. his father

A man came to 'Umar bin khattab and said: "I became impure following sexual emission and cannot find any water." 'Umar said to him: "Do not pray." But 'Ammar bin Yasir said: "Do you not remember, O Commander of the Believers, when you and I were on a military expedition and we became sexually impure and could not find water? As for you, you did not pray, but I rolled in the dust and then prayed. When I came to the Prophet and told him what had happened, he said: 'It would have been enough for you (to do this).' (Then demonstrating) the Prophet struck the ground with his hands, then blew on hem, and wiped his face and palms with them."

Grades by grader

Zubair Ali ZaiSoundfawazahmed0, hadithunlocked, sunnah.com
Muhammad Fuad Abd al-BaqiSahihfawazahmed0
al-AlbaniSahihfawazahmed0

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    حديث عمار فورد بذكر الكفين في الصحيحين وبذكر المرفقين في السنن وفي رواية إلى نصف الذراع وفي رواية إلى الآباط فأما رواية المرفقين وكذا نصف الذراع ففيهما مقال وأما رواية الآباط فقال الشافعي وغيره مما تقدم ذكره مرارا ومما يقوي رواية الصحيحين في الاقتصار على الوجه والكفين

    machine translationAs for the hadith of ʿAmmār, it came with mention of the two palms in the two Ṣaḥīḥs, with mention of the elbows in the Sunan, in one narration up to half the forearm, and in another up to the armpits. The narrations of the elbows and likewise of half the forearm are open to criticism. As for the narration of the armpits, al-Shāfiʿī and others said what has been mentioned many times before. Among what strengthens the narration of the two Ṣaḥīḥs is that it limits tayammum to the face and the two palms.

    in سنن ابن ماجه, p. 611
  • Taḥāwī

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in سنن ابن ماجه, p. 611
  • Badr al-Dīn al-ʿAynī

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in سنن ابن ماجه, p. 611
  • أبو الحسنات اللكنوي

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in سنن ابن ماجه, p. 611

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. eminent, well-known Companion, among the earliest to embrace Islamd. 37 AH
    عَمَّار بْن يَاسِرصحابي جليل مشهور من السابقين الأولين
    في حكم العنعنة
  2. Young Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 70-odd AH
    أَبِيهِصحابي صغير
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 91 AH and 100 AH
    ابْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَىثقة
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. before the year 100 AH
    ذَرٍّثقة عابد
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), except that he sometimes practised concealment (tadlīs)d. 113 AH, or 114 AH, or 115; also said 110 AH
    الْحَكَمِثقة ثبت فقيه ، إلا أنه ربما دلس
    عن
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    حدثنا
  7. Trustworthy (thiqah), his book was sound (ṣaḥīḥ al-kitāb), except that he had some heedlessness (ghaflah)d. 192 AH or 193 AH or 194 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍثقة صحيح الكتاب إلا أن فيه غفلة
    حدثنا
  8. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 252 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍثقة
    حدثنا
  9. one of the imams, a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ)d. 273 AH, or: 275 AH
    ابْنُ مَاجَهْأحد الأئمة ، حافظ

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Commentaries

الاعتبار في الناسخ والمنسوخ
Hāshiyat al-Sindī on Abū Daʿūd

Read them on Hadith Unlocked

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us