MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 3652

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّ قَالَ: نَا أَبُو قُتَيْبَةَ قَالَ: نَا الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ صُبَيْحٍ، عَنِ الْحَسَنِ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرَةَ - ؓ

أَنَّهُ رَكَعَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَصِلَ الصَّفَّ فَقَالَ لَهُ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ: زَادَكَ اللهُ حِرْصًا وَلَا تَعُدْ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAmr b. ʿAlī
  2. Abū Qutaybah
  3. al-Rabīʿ b. Ṣubayḥ
  4. al-Ḥasan
  5. Abū Bakrah

✧ He bowed before reaching the row, and the Messenger of God ﷺ said to him: "May God increase you in eagerness, and do not repeat [it]."

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Dāraquṭnī

    الحديث منقطع الحسن إنما يروي عن الأحنف بن قيس عن أبي بكرة

    machine translationThe hadith is disconnected (munqaṭiʿ): al-Ḥasan only narrates from al-Aḥnaf b. Qays, from Abū Bakrah.

    in مسند البزار, p. 3652
  • ابن الملقن

    هذا الحديث صحيح

    machine translationThis hadith is authentic (ṣaḥīḥ).

    in مسند البزار, p. 3652

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 50 AH, or: 51 AH, or: 52 AH, or: 59 AH, also said: 53 AH
    أَبُو بَكْرَةَ الثَّقَفِيُّصحابي
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), virtuous and well known; he would often narrate with omission of the Companion (irsāl) and practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. 110 AH
    الْحَسَنِثقة فقيه ، فاضل مشهور ، وكان يرسل كثيرا ويدلس
    عن
  3. truthful (ṣadūq), poor memory (sayyiʾ al-ḥifẓ), and he was a devout worshipper and a mujāhidd. 160 AH
    الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ صُبَيْحٍصدوق ، سيئ الحفظ ، وكان عابدا مجاهدا
    نا
  4. truthful (ṣadūq)d. 200 AH or 201 AH or 202 AH
    أَبُو قُتَيْبَةَصدوق
    نا
  5. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 249 AH
    عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  6. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us