MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 21104

✧ Sahl bin Saad, about Abu bin Ka'ab

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْيَمَانِ أَخْبَرَنَا شُعَيْبٌ عَنْ الزُّهْرِيِّ قَالَ سَهْلُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ الْأَنْصَارِيُّ وَكَانَ قَدْ رَأَى النَّبِيَّ ﷺ وَسَمِعَ مِنْهُ وَذَكَرَ أَنَّهُ ابْنُ خَمْسَ عَشْرَةَ سَنَةً حِينَ تُوُفِّيَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ حَدَّثَنِي أُبَيُّ بْنُ كَعْبٍ

أَنَّ الْفُتْيَا الَّتِي كَانُوا يُفْتُونَ بِهَا رُخْصَةٌ، كَانَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ رَخَّصَ فِيهَا فِي أَوَّلِ الْإِسْلَامِ، ثُمَّ أَمَرَ بِالِاغْتِسَالِ بَعْدُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Abū al-Yamān
  2. Shuʿayb
  3. al-Zuhrī
  4. Sahl b. Saʿd al-Anṣārī and Kān Qad Raʾá al-Nabī ﷺ
  5. Minh Wadhakar
  6. Ibn Khams ʿAshrah Sanah Ḥīn Tuwuffī al-Nabī ﷺ
  7. Ubay b. Kaʿb

✧ That the legal ruling they used to give was a concession. The Prophet ﷺ granted it in the early days of Islam, then he commanded ghusl afterwards.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr

    وقد تقدم أن ابن شهاب لم يسمعه من سهل بن سعد وإنما رواه عن أبي حازم عن سهل بن سعد وهو حديث صحيح ثابت بنقل العدول والثقات له

    machine translationIt has already been mentioned that Ibn Shihāb did not hear it from Sahl b. Saʿd; rather he narrated it from Abū Ḥāzim, from Sahl b. Saʿd. It is a sound (ṣaḥīḥ) hadith, established by the transmission of upright and trustworthy (thiqāt) narrators.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 21430
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    صححه ابن خزيمة وابن حبان وقال الإسماعيلي هو صحيح على شرط البخاري كذا قال وكأنه لم يطلع على علته فقد اختلفوا في كون الزهري سمعه من سهل نعم أخرجه أبو داود وابن خزيمة أيضا من طريق أبي حازم عن سهل ولهذا الإسناد أيضا علة أخرى ذكرها ابن أبي حاتم وفي الجملة هو إسناد صالح لأن يحتج به

    machine translationIbn Khuzaymah and Ibn Ḥibbān graded it sound (ṣaḥīḥ). Al-Ismāʿīlī said: It is sound (ṣaḥīḥ) according to the criterion of al-Bukhārī. So he said, but it seems he was not aware of its defect (ʿillah), for they differed over whether al-Zuhrī heard it from Sahl. Yes, Abū Dāwūd and also Ibn Khuzaymah reported it through Abū Ḥāzim from Sahl. This chain also has another defect, which Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned. In sum, it is a chain fit to be used as evidence.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 21430

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the distinguished Companions (min fuḍalāʾ al-ṣaḥābah)d. 19 AH, or 20 AH, or 22 AH, or 30 AH, or 32 AH, or 33 AH
    أُبَيُّ بْنُ كَعْبٍمن فضلاء الصحابة
    حدثني
  2. He and his father were Companions (ṣuḥbah).d. Abū Nuʿaym and more than one said: 88 AH. Al-Wāqidī and others said: 91 AH. Abū Ḥātim al-Rāzī said: he lived a hundred years or more, so on this basis he would have lived until the year 96 AH or after it
    سَهْلُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ الْأَنْصَارِيُّله ولأبيه صحبة
    قال
  3. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    الزُّهْرِيِّالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 162 AH, or 163 AH
    شُعَيْبٌثقة عابد
    أخبرنا
  5. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 221 AH, or 222 AH
    أَبُو الْيَمَانِثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us