MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 11289

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ حَدَّثَنَا فِطْرٌ عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ رَجَاءٍ عَنْ أَبِيهِعَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ قَالَ

إِنَّ مِنْكُمْ مَنْ يُقَاتِلُ عَلَى تَأْوِيلِهِ كَمَا قَاتَلْتُ عَلَى تَنْزِيلِهِ. قَالَ: فَقَامَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ، وَعُمَرُ فَقَالَ: لَا، وَلَكِنَّهُ خَاصِفُ النَّعْلِ [قَالَ]، وَعَلِيٌّ [ ؓ ] يَخْصِفُ نَعْلَهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Wakīʿ
  2. Fiṭr
  3. Ismāʿīl b. Rajāʾ
  4. Abīhiʿan Abū Saʿīd

✧ Among you is one who will fight for its interpretation just as I fought for its revelation. He said: Abu Bakr and 'Umar stood up, and he said: 'No, but it is the one mending the sandal.' He said: And 'Ali ؓ was mending his sandal.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū al-Ḥasan Nur al-Dīn ʿAlī b. Abi Bakr al-Haythamī

    وإسناده جيد

    machine translationIts chain of transmission is good (jayyid).

    in مسند أحمد, p. 11403

Narrators

  1. He and his father were Companions (ṣuḥbah).d. 63 AH, or 64 AH, or 65 AH, or 74 AH
    أَبُو سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيُّله ولأبيه صحبة
    عن
  2. truthful (ṣadūq)
    أَبِيهِصدوق
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah); al-Azdī spoke against him without proofd. between 111 and 120 AH
    إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ رَجَاءٍثقة ، تكلم فيه الأزدي بلا حجة
    عن
  4. truthful (ṣadūq), accused of Shiʿism (rumiya bi-l-tashayyuʿ)d. Ibn Ḥibbān said: 153 AH, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd Allāh al-Ḥaḍramī said: 155 AH, also said: 156 AH
    فِطْرٌصدوق ، رمي بالتشيع
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy, a memorizer, devout (thiqah ḥāfiẓ ʿābid)d. 196 AH, or 197 AH, or 198 AH
    وَكِيعٌثقة حافظ عابد
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us