MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Abi Ya'la 644

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْأَعْلَى بْنُ حَمَّادٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْجَبَّارِ بْنُ الْوَرْدِ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ ابْنَ أَبِي مُلَيْكَةَ، يَقُولُ: كَانَ طَلْحَةُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللهِ، يَقُولُ:

لَا أُخْبِرُكُمْ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ بِشَيْءٍ، إِلَّا أَنِّي سَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ: عَمْرُو بْنُ الْعَاصِ مِنْ صَالِحِي قُرَيْشٍ، وَنِعْمَ أَهْلُ الْبَيْتِ أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ، وَأُمُّ عَبْدِ اللهِ، وَعَبْدُ اللهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAbd al-Aʿlá b. Ḥammād
  2. ʿAbd al-Jabbār b. al-Ward
  3. Ibn Abū Mulaykah
  4. Kān Ṭalḥah b. ʿUbaydullāh

✧ I will not tell you anything from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ except that I heard him say: "Amr b. al-As is among the righteous of Quraysh, and what an excellent household: Abu Abdullah, Umm Abdullah, and Abdullah."

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    رجال سنده ثقات إلا أن فيه انقطاعا بين ابن أبي مليكة وطلحة

    machine translationThe men of its chain are trustworthy (thiqāt), except that it contains a break in the chain (inqiṭāʿ) between Ibn Abī Mulaykah and Ṭalḥah.

    in مسند أبي يعلى الموصلي, p. 644

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the Ten (promised Paradise)d. 36 AH
    طَلْحَةُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ الْفَيَّاضُاحد العشرة
    يقول
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh)d. 117 AH, also said: 118 AH, and al-Dhahabī stated it definitively
    ابْنَ أَبِي مُلَيْكَةَثقة فقيه
    سمعت
  3. truthful (ṣadūq), prone to error (yahim)d. between 161 AH and 170 AH
    عَبْدُ الْجَبَّارِ بْنُ الْوَرْدِصدوق يهم
    حدثنا
  4. no harm in him (lā baʾs bih)d. Ibn Ḥajar said: 236 AH, or 237 AH, said by al-Bukhārī, or: 239 AH
    عَبْدُ الْأَعْلَى بْنُ حَمَّادٍلا بأس به
    حدثنا
  5. أبو يعلى الموصلي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us