MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Tayalisi 1129

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو دَاوُدَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ سِمَاكٍ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ مُرَيَّ بْنَ قَطَرِيٍّ يَقُولُ: سَمِعْتُ عَدِيَّ بْنَ حَاتِمٍ يُحَدِّثُ

أَنَّهُ سَأَلَ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ فَقَالَ: يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ، آخُذُ الصَّيْدَ فَلَا أَجِدُ مَا أَذْبَحُهُ بِهِ إِلَّا الْمَرْوَةَ وَالْعَصَا ! فَقَالَ: أَمْرِرِ الدَّمَ بِمَا شِئْتَ وَاذْكُرِ اسْمَ اللهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Abū Dāwud
  2. Shuʿbah
  3. Simāk
  4. Muray b. Qaṭarī
  5. ʿAdī b. Ḥātim Yuḥaddith

✧ He asked the Prophet ﷺ: 'O Messenger of Allah, I catch game but I find nothing to slaughter it with except a sharp stone or a stick!' He said: 'Cause the blood to flow with whatever you wish, and mention the name of Allah.'

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥazm

    هذا خبر ساقط لأنه عن سماك بن حرب وهو يقبل التلقين عن مري بن قطري وهو مجهول

    machine translationThis report is unacceptable (sāqiṭ), because it is from Simāk b. Ḥarb, who would accept prompting (talqīn), and it is from Murayy b. Qaṭarī, who is unknown (majhūl).

    in مسند الطيالسي, p. 1129

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Famous Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 66 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, or 69 AH
    عَدِيُّ بْنُ حَاتِمٍ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ الطَّائِيُّصحابي شهير
    سمعت
  2. acceptable (maqbūl)
    مُرَيَّ بْنَ قَطَرِيٍّمقبول
    سمعت
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq); his narrations from ʿIkrimah in particular are inconsistent (muḍṭarib); he changed (taghayyara) towards the end of his life, and at times he would accept prompting (yulaqqan).d. 123 AH
    سِمَاكٍصدوق , وروايته عن عكرمة خاصة مضطربة , وقد تغير بأخرة ، فكان ربما يلقن
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), who erred in some hadithsd. 203 AH, or 204 AH
    أَبُو دَاوُدَثقة حافظ , غلط في أحاديث

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us