MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 18264

Adi b. Hatim al-Tai

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا بَهْزٌ حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ حَدَّثَنَا سِمَاكُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ فَذَكَرَهُ مِنْ مَوْضِعِ الصَّيْدِوَقَالَ

أَمْرِرِ الدَّمَ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Bahz
  2. Ḥammād b. Salamah
  3. Simāk b. Ḥarb Fadhakarah Min Mawḍiʿ al-Ṣaydiwaqāl

✧ Let the blood flow.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥazm

    هذا خبر ساقط لأنه عن سماك بن حرب وهو يقبل التلقين عن مري بن قطري وهو مجهول

    machine translationThis report is unacceptable (sāqiṭ), because it is from Simāk b. Ḥarb, who would accept prompting (talqīn), and it is from Murayy b. Qaṭarī, who is unknown (majhūl).

    in مسند أحمد, p. 18487

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Famous Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 66 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, or 69 AH
    عَدِيُّ بْنُ حَاتِمٍ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ الطَّائِيُّصحابي شهير
    سمعت
  2. acceptable (maqbūl)
    مري بن قطري القطريمقبول
    سمعت
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq); his narrations from ʿIkrimah in particular are inconsistent (muḍṭarib); he changed (taghayyara) towards the end of his life, and at times he would accept prompting (yulaqqan).d. 123 AH
    سِمَاكُ بْنُ حَرْبٍصدوق , وروايته عن عكرمة خاصة مضطربة , وقد تغير بأخرة ، فكان ربما يلقن
    حدثنا
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid), the most reliable of people in narrating from Thābit; his memory changed towards the end of his lifed. 167 AH, or 165 AH.
    حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَثقه عابد ، أثبت الناس في ثابت ، وتغير حفظه بآخره
    حدثنا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq)d. before 160 AH
    بَهْزٌصدوق
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us