al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 8754
✧ Mutallib b. Shu'ayb
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا مُطَّلِبٌ، قَالَ: نَا عَبْدُ اللهِ: حَدَّثَنِي ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْمُنْكَدِرِ، عَنْ جَابِرٍ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ يَقُولُ:
الرِّفْقُ فِي الْمَعِيشَةِ خَيْرٌ مِنْ بَعْضِ التِّجَارَةِ
Translation
Chain of narrators
- Muṭṭalib
- ʿAbdullāh
- Ibn Lahīʿah
- Muḥammad b. al-Munkadir
- Jābir
- Rasūl Allāh ﷺ
✧ Gentleness in livelihood is better than some trade.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Abū al-Ḥasan Nur al-Dīn ʿAlī b. Abi Bakr al-Haythamī
وفيه عبد الله بن صالح المصري قال عبد الملك بن شعيب ثقة مأمون وضعفه جماعة
in المعجم الأوسط, p. 8754
Narrators
- Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ in some reports from them: 68 AH. Abū Sulaymān b. Zabr said: 72 AH. Muḥammad b. Saʿd said, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī in another report: 73 AH. Muḥammad b. Yaḥyā b. Ḥabbān said: 77 AH. Abū ʿAwn al-Madanī and others said: 78 AH. Abū Nuʿaym and Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ in another report said: 79 AHجَابِرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ حَرَامٍ الْأَنْصَارِيُّصحابيعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), excellent (fāḍil)d. 130 AH, or 131 AHمُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْمُنْكَدِرِثقة فاضلعن
- Truthful (ṣadūq); his memory became confused after his books were burned (khallaṭa baʿda iḥtirāq kutubihi); the narrations of Ibn al-Mubārak and Ibn Wahb from him are more sound than those of others.d. 173 AH, or 174 AH, also said 170 AH, also said 175 AHابْنُ لَهِيعَةَصدوق ، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه ، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهماحدثني
- truthful (ṣadūq) but made many mistakes; reliable (thabt) in his written book; there was heedlessness (ghaflah) in himd. 222 AH, or 223 AHعَبْدُ اللهِصدوق كثير الغلط ، ثبت في كتابه ، وكانت فيه غفلةنا
- مُطَّلِبٌحدثنا
- d. 360 AHالطبراني
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.