MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 6389

✧ Muhammad b. Amr b. Khalid al-Harrani

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَمْرٍو، ثَنَا أَبِي، ثَنَا ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَ، عَنْ دَرَّاجٍ، عَنْ أَبِي الْهَيْثَمِ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ:

مَنْ أَلِفَ الْمَسْجِدَ أَلِفَهُ اللهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. ʿAmr
  2. my father
  3. Ibn Lahīʿah
  4. Darrāj
  5. Abū al-Haytham
  6. Abū Saʿīd
  7. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ Whoever becomes attached to the mosque, God becomes attached to him.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Sulaymān b. Aḥmad al-Ṭabarānī

    لم يروه عن دراج إلا ابن لهيعة تفرد به عمرو بن خالد الحراني

    in المعجم الأوسط, p. 6389
  • Abū al-Ḥasan Nur al-Dīn ʿAlī b. Abi Bakr al-Haythamī

    وفيه ابن لهيعة وفيه كلام

    machine translationIt includes Ibn Lahīʿah, and there is criticism concerning him.

    in المعجم الأوسط, p. 6389

Narrators

  1. He and his father were Companions (ṣuḥbah).d. 63 AH, or 64 AH, or 65 AH, or 74 AH
    أَبُو سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيُّله ولأبيه صحبة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 91 and 100 AH
    أَبِي الْهَيْثَمِثقة
    عن
  3. truthful (ṣadūq) in his narration from Abū al-Haytham, deemed weakd. 126 AH, Ibn Ḥibbān said: 182 AH
    دَرَّاجٍصدوق في حديثه عن أبي الهيثم ، ضعف
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq); his memory became confused after his books were burned (khallaṭa baʿda iḥtirāq kutubihi); the narrations of Ibn al-Mubārak and Ibn Wahb from him are more sound than those of others.d. 173 AH, or 174 AH, also said 170 AH, also said 175 AH
    ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَصدوق ، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه ، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهما
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 229 AH, or 230 AH
    أَبِيثقة
    حدثنا
  6. مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَمْرٍو
    حدثنا
  7. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us