MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Matalib al-'Aliyah 83

✧ The Siwak

Show the chain

وَقَالَ أَبُو يَعْلَى: حَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللهِ، ثَنَا يُوسُفُ بْنُ خَالِدٍ، عَنِ الْأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ ؓ « أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ

كَانَ يَسْتَاكُ بِفَضْلِ وَضُوئِهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Abū Yaʿlá
  2. ʿUbaydullāh
  3. Yūsuf b. Khālid
  4. al-Aʿmash
  5. Anas b. Mālik
  6. al-Nabī ﷺ

✧ He used to use the siwak with the leftover water of his ablution.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Dāraquṭnī

    وخالفه سعد بن الصلت رواه عن الأعمش عن مسلم الأعور عن أنس وهو أصح

    machine translationSaʿd b. al-Ṣalt contradicted him, narrating it from al-Aʿmash, from Muslim al-Aʿwar, from Anas, and this is more authentic (aṣaḥḥ).

    in المطالب العالية, p. 83
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    وفي إسناده يوسف بن خالد السمتي وهو متروك

    machine translationIn its chain of transmission is Yūsuf b. Khālid al-Samtī, and he is abandoned (matrūk).

    in المطالب العالية, p. 83

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), knowledgeable in the recitations (qirāʾāt), scrupulous (wariʿ), but he practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. Abū ʿAwānah said, and ʿAbd Allāh b. Dāwūd: 147 AH. Wakīʿ said, and more than one: 148 AH. And al-Khaṭīb considered it correct. Also said: 145 AH
    الْأَعْمَشِثقة حافظ , عارف بالقراءات ورع لكنه يدلس
    عن
  3. They abandoned him (tarakūhu), and Ibn Maʿīn called him a liar (kadhdhabahu).d. 189 AH, or 190 AH
    يُوسُفُ بْنُ خَالِدٍتركوه ، وكذبه ابن معين
    حدثنا
  4. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 233 AH or 234 AH or 235 AH
    عُبَيْدُ اللهِثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  5. أَبُو يَعْلَى

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us