Sahih Ibn Hibban 5301
✧ al-Diyaafah
Show the chain
أَخْبَرَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ سُفْيَانَ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ سَلَّامٍ الْجُمَحِيُّ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ عَنْ ثَابِتٍ عَنْ أَنَسٍ
أَنَّ رَجُلًا فَارِسِيًّا كَانَ جَارًا لِلنَّبِيِّ ﷺ وَكَانَتْ مَرَقَتُهُ أَطْيَبَ شَيْءٍ رِيحًا فَصَنَعَ طَعَامًا ثُمَّ أَتَى النَّبِيَّ ﷺ فَأَوْمَأَ إِلَيْهِ أَنْ تَعَالَ وَعَائِشَةُ إِلَى جَنْبِهِ فَقَالَ ﷺ «وَهَذِهِ مَعِي» وَأَشَارَ إِلَى عَائِشَةَ فَقَالَ لَا قَالَ ثُمَّ أَشَارَ إِلَيْهِ فَقَالَ «وَهَذِهِ مَعِي» قَالَ لَا ثُمَّ أَشَارَ إِلَيْهِ الثَّالِثَةَ فَقَالَ «وَهَذِهِ مَعِي» وَأَشَارَ إِلَى عَائِشَةَ قَالَ نَعَمْ
Translation
Chain of narrators
- al-Ḥasan b. Sufyān
- ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. Sallām al-Jumaḥī
- Ḥammād b. Salamah
- Thābit
- Anas
✧ A Persian man was a neighbor of the Prophet ﷺ, and his broth was the best smelling thing. He prepared food, then came to the Prophet ﷺ and gestured to him to come. 'A'ishah was beside him. He ﷺ said: “And this one with me,” and pointed to 'A'ishah. He said: No. He said: Then he gestured to him again, and he said: “And this one with me.” He said: No. Then he gestured to him a third time, and he said: “And this one with me,” and pointed to 'A'ishah. He said: Yes.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
Other narrations of this report
Narrators
- a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AHأَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهورعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 122 AH, or 123 AH, or 126 AH, or 127 AH, or 129 AHثَابِتٍثقة عابدعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid), the most reliable of people in narrating from Thābit; his memory changed towards the end of his lifed. 167 AH, or 165 AH.حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَثقه عابد ، أثبت الناس في ثابت ، وتغير حفظه بآخرهحدثنا
- truthful (ṣadūq)d. 231 AH, or: after itعَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ سَلَّامٍ الْجُمَحِيُّصدوقحدثنا
- d. 303 AHالْحَسَنُ بْنُ سُفْيَانَأخبرنا
- d. 354 AHابن حبان
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.