MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sahih Ibn Hibban 5222

✧ Etiquette of eating

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا الْفَضْلُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِ الْجُمَحِيُّ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا سَهْلُ بْنُ بَكَّارٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا وُهَيْبٌ عَنْ أَيُّوبَ عَنْ أَبِي قِلَابَةَ عَنْ زَهْدَمٍ الْجَرْمِيِّ قَالَ

دَخَلْنَا عَلَى أَبِي مُوسَى وَبَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ دَجَاجَةٌ يَأْكُلُ مِنْهَا قُلْنَا تَأْكُلُ مِنْهَا؟ فَقَالَ أَكَلْتُهُ عَلَى مَائِدَةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. al-Faḍl b. al-Ḥubāb al-Jumaḥī
  2. Sahl b. Bakkār
  3. Wuhayb
  4. Ayyūb
  5. Abū Qilābah
  6. Zahdam al-Jarmī

✧ We entered upon Abu Musa while a chicken was before him, and he was eating from it. We said: You are eating from it? He said: I ate it on the table of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 42 AH, or 44 AH, or 50 AH, or 52 AH, or 53 AH, also said 49 AH, also said 51 AH
    أَبُو مُوسَى الْأَشْعَرِيُّصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 91 and 100 AH
    زَهْدَمٍ الْجَرْمِيِّثقة
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), excellent, who often narrated mursal reports (kathīr al-irsāl)d. 104 AH, or 105 AH, or 106 AH, or 107 AH
    أَبِي قِلَابَةَثقة فاضل ، كثير الإرسال
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), an authority (ḥujjah), one of the leading jurists and devout worshippersd. 130 AH, or 131 AH, or 132 AH, also said: 124 AH, also said: 125 AH, also said: 129 AH
    أَيُّوبَثقة ثبت حجة ، من كبار الفقهاء العباد
    عن
  5. memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), trustworthy and reliable (thiqah thabt), but he changed slightly at the end of his lifed. 165 AH, also said: 169 AH
    وُهَيْبٌالحافظ ، ثقة ثبت ، لكنه تغير قليلا بآخره
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah), sometimes had lapses (wahm)d. 227 AH or 228 AH, or 229 AH
    سَهْلُ بْنُ بَكَّارٍثقة , ربما وهم
    حدثنا
  7. الْفَضْلُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِ الْجُمَحِيُّ
    أخبرنا
  8. d. 354 AH
    ابن حبان

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us