Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah 21715
✧ On preemption: does it belong to the absent one or not?
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ حَسَنٍ، عَنْ مُجَالِدٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ قَالَ:
لِلْغَائِبِ شُفْعَةٌ، تُكْتَبُ [١]إِلَيْهِ؛ فَإِنْ أَخَذَ وَبَعَثَ بِالثَّمَنِ، وَإِلَّا فَلَا شُفْعَةَ لَهُ
Translation
Machine translation, not reviewed
There is a right of pre-emption for the absent [co-owner]; he is written to. If he takes it and sends the price, [well and good]; otherwise there is no pre-emption for him.
No source translates this, so this English was written by a computer model. It can be wrong; rely on the Arabic. Report a problem below.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade