MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mustadrak (al-Hakim) 8215

أَخْبَرَنَا الشَّيْخُ أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ أَنْبَأَ إِسْمَاعِيلُ بْنُ قُتَيْبَةَ ثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ يَحْيَى أَنْبَأَ أَبُو خَيْثَمَةَ زُهَيْرُ بْنُ مُعَاوِيَةَ عَنْ زِيَادِ بْنِ عِلَاقَةَ عَنْ أُسَامَةَ بْنِ شَرِيكٍ وَمِنْهُمْ عَمْرُو بْنُ أَبِي قَيْسٍ الرَّازِيُّ

Translation

✧ The Shaykh Abu Bakr b. Ishaq informed us, Isma'il b. Qutaybah narrated to us, Yahya b. Yahya narrated to us, Abu Khaythamah Zuhayr b. Mu'awiyah informed us, from Ziyad b. 'Ilaqah, from Usamah b. Sharik; among them 'Amr b. Abi Qays al-Razi.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū ʿAbdullāh al-Ḥākim

    حديث صحيح ولم يخرجاه وعلته عندهما أن أسامة بن شريك لا يروي عنه غير زياد بن علاقة

    machine translationA sound (ṣaḥīḥ) hadith, though the two of them (al-Bukhārī and Muslim) did not narrate it. Their reason for it, in their view, is that no one narrates from Usāmah b. Sharīk except Ziyād b. ʿIlāqah.

    in المستدرك على الصحيحين, p. 8308
  • Abū ʿAbdullāh al-Ḥākim

    صححه

    machine translationHe declared it sound (ṣaḥḥaḥahu).

    in المستدرك على الصحيحين, p. 8308

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. between 61 and 70 AH
    أُسَامَةُ بْنُ شَرِيكٍ الذُّبْيَانِيُّصحابي
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 135 AH, also said: 125 AH or shortly after it
    زياد بن علاقة الثعلبيثقة
    عن
  3. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 172 AH, or: 173 AH, or: 174 AH, 177 AH
    زهير بن معاوية بن حديجثقة ثبت
    أنبأ
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), an imam (imām).d. 226 AH, or 224 AH, or 225 AH; both of the latter two are mistaken.
    يحيى بن يحيى الحنظليثقة ثبت إمام .
    حدثنا
  5. إسماعيل بن قتيبة البشتنقاني
    أنبأ
  6. أحمد بن إسحاق بن أيوب الصبغي
    أخبرنا
  7. d. 403 AH, or 405 AH
    الحاكم

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us