al-Mustadrak (al-Hakim) 7131
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرٍ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ الْفَقِيهُ ثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ الزِّبْرِقَانِ ثَنَا أَبُو دَاودَ الطَّيَالِسِيُّ ثَنَا أَبُو عَامِرٍ الْخَزَّازُ عَنِ الْحَسَنِ عَنْ سَعِيدٍ مَوْلَى أَبِي بَكْرٍ قَالَ
«قُرِّبَتْ بَيْنَ يَدَيِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ تَمْرًا فَجَعَلُوا يَقْرُنُونَ فَنَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ عَنِ الْإِقْرَانِ»
Translation
Chain of narrators
- Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. Sulaymān al-Faqīh
- Yaḥyá b. Jaʿfar b. al-Zibriqān
- Abū Dāwd al-Ṭayālisī
- Abū ʿĀmir al-Khazzāz
- al-Ḥasan
- Saʿīd a freed slave of Abū Bakr
✧ “Dates were placed before the Prophet ﷺ, and they began to eat two at a time, so the Messenger of Allah ﷺ forbade eating two at a time.”
Notes
هَذَا حَدِيثٌ صَحِيحُ الْإِسْنَادِ وَلَمْ يُخَرِّجَاهُ هَكَذَا صحيح
Grades by grader
| al-Dhahabi | Sound | hadithunlocked |
|---|
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Abū ʿAbdullāh al-Ḥākim
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد ولم يخرجاه هكذا
machine translationThis is a hadith with a sound chain (ṣaḥīḥ al-isnād), and the two Shaykhs did not narrate it in this way.
in المستدرك على الصحيحين, p. 7224
Other narrations of this report
Narrators
- Companion (ṣaḥābī)سَعْد الْبَصْرِيّ مَوْلَى أَبِي بَكْر الصِّدِّيقصحابيعن
- Trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), virtuous and well known; he would often narrate with omission of the Companion (irsāl) and practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. 110 AHالْحَسَنِثقة فقيه ، فاضل مشهور ، وكان يرسل كثيرا ويدلسعن
- truthful (ṣadūq), makes many mistakesd. 152 AHأَبُو عَامِرٍ ج٤ / ص١٢٠الْخَزَّازُصدوق , كثير الخطأحدثنا
- trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), who erred in some hadithsd. 203 AH, or 204 AHأَبُو دَاوُدَ الطَّيَالِسِيُّثقة حافظ , غلط في أحاديثحدثنا
- d. 275 AHيَحْيَى بْنُ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ الزِّبْرِقَانِحدثنا
- d. 348 AHأَبُو بَكْرٍ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ الْفَقِيهُحدثنا
- d. 403 AH, or 405 AHالحاكم
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.