Musnad al-Bazzar 5930
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سِنَانٍ الْوَاسِطِيُّ، نَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ، نَا الْأَعْمَشُ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ قَالَ:
لَقَدْ رَأَيْتُنَا وَمَا الرَّجُلُ الْمُسْلِمُ أَحَقَّ بِدِينَارِهِ وَدِرْهَمِهِ مِنْ أَخِيهِ الْمُسْلِمِ
Translation
Chain of narrators
- Aḥmad b. Sinān al-Wāsiṭī
- Abū Muʿāwiyah
- al-Aʿmash
- Nāfiʿ
- Ibn ʿUmar
✧ We have seen ourselves when a Muslim man had no more right to his dinar and dirham than his Muslim brother.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
Narrators
- One of the Companions who narrated most often, and one of the ʿAbādilah; he was among the people most strict in following the narrations (athar).d. 72 AH, or 73 AH, or 74 AH, also said: 75 AHعَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِأحد المكثرين من الصحابة والعبادلة ، وكان من أشد الناس اتباعا للأثرعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a well-known jurist (faqīh)d. 116 AH, or 117 AH, or 118 AH, or 119 AH, or 120 AHنَافِعٍثقة ثبت فقيه مشهورعن
- Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), knowledgeable in the recitations (qirāʾāt), scrupulous (wariʿ), but he practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. Abū ʿAwānah said, and ʿAbd Allāh b. Dāwūd: 147 AH. Wakīʿ said, and more than one: 148 AH. And al-Khaṭīb considered it correct. Also said: 145 AHالْأَعْمَشُثقة حافظ , عارف بالقراءات ورع لكنه يدلسنا
- Trustworthy (thiqah), the best memorizer of people for the hadith of al-Aʿmash, though he may err in the hadith of othersd. 194 AH, or 195 AHأَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَثقة ، أحفظ الناس لحديث الأعمش ، وقد يهم في حديث غيرهنا
- trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. al-Nasāʾī said: it is said: 256 AH, also said: 258 AH, also said: 259 AH. In al-Silafī's questions to Khamīs al-Ḥawzī: 254 AH, Ibn Ḥajar said: the correct one is 259 AH, Ibn Ḥibbān said: 250 AH, or shortly before or after itأَحْمَدُ بْنُ سِنَانٍ الْوَاسِطِيُّثقة حافظحدثنا
- d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AHالبزار
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.