MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 4722

✧ Tawus, from b. 'Abbas

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ الْجُنَيْدِ، قَالَ: نَا يَحْيَى بْنُ السَّكَنِ، قَالَ: نَا شُعْبَةُ قَالَ: أَنَا خَالِدٌ الْحَذَّاءُ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ عِكْرِمَةَ يَقُولُ: وَلَا أُرَاهُ إِلَّا عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ؓ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ:

الْعَائِدُ فِي هِبَتِهِ كَالْكَلْبِ يَعُودُ فِي قَيْئِهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Aḥmad b. al-Junayd
  2. Yaḥyá b. al-Sakan
  3. Shuʿbah
  4. Khālid al-Ḥadhhāʾ
  5. ʿIkrimah
  6. And Lā Urāh Illā
  7. Ibn ʿAbbās
  8. al-Nabī ﷺ

✧ The one who takes back his gift is like a dog that returns to its vomit.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
    عِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
    سمعت
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah); he narrates with omission of the intermediary (yursil).d. 141 AH, or 142 AH, or more.
    خَالِدٌ الْحَذَّاءُثقة يرسل.
    أنا
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    نا
  5. يَحْيَى بْنُ السَّكَنِ
    نا
  6. مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ الْجُنَيْدِ
    حدثنا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us