MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 1630

✧ The first hadith of Alqamah, from Abdullah b. Mas'ud, from the Prophet ﷺ

Show the chain

1630 1618 - وَحَدَّثَنَا يُوسُفُ بْنُ مُوسَى، قَالَ:

نَا قَبِيصَةُ، عَنْ سُفْيَانَ، عَنِ الْحَسَنِ بْنِ عُبَيْدِ اللهِ، عَنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ سُوَيْدٍ، عَنْ عَلْقَمَةَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ، بِنَحْوِهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Yūsuf b. Mūsá

✧ Qabisah narrated to us, from Sufyan, from al-Hasan b. 'Ubaydillah, from Ibrahim b. Suwayd, from Alqamah, from 'Abdullah, from the Prophet ﷺ, something similar.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Narrators

  1. One of the earliest and foremost (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), and one of the leading scholars among the Companions; his virtues are manyd. 28 AH, or 32 AH, 33 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍمن السابقين الأولين ، ومن كبار العلماء من الصحابة ، مناقبه جمة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt), jurist, devout worshipperd. 61 AH, or 62 AH, or 65 AH, or 72 AH, or 73 AH, also said: 63 AH
    علقمة بن قيس النخعيثقة ثبت فقيه عابد
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), it is not established that al-Nasāʾī deemed him weakd. between 91 and 100 AH
    إبراهيم بن سويد الصيرفي الأعورثقة ، لم يثبت أن النسائي ضعفه
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), excellent (fāḍil)d. 139 AH, also said: 142 AH
    الحسن بن عبيد الله النخعيثقة فاضل
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), devout (ʿābid), an imam and authority (ḥujjah)d. 159 AH or 160 AH or 161 AH or 162 AH
    سفيان الثوريثقة حافظ , فقيه عابد ، إمام حجة
    عن
  6. truthful (ṣadūq), sometimes contradicts othersd. 213 AH, or: 215 AH
    قبيصة بن عقبة السوائيصدوق ربما خالف
    نا
  7. truthful (ṣadūq)d. 253 AH
    يُوسُفُ بْنُ مُوسَىصدوق
    حدثنا
  8. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us