MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 1399

✧ among what Abd al-Rahman b. Abza narrated from Ammar

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى قَالَ: نَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ قَالَ: نَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنِ الْحَكَمِ، عَنْ ذَرٍّ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَى، عَنْ أَبِيهِ:

أَنَّ رَجُلًا أَتَى عُمَرَ رَحِمَهُ اللهُ، وَقَالَ: إِنِّي أَجْنَبْتُ فَلَمْ أَجِدْ مَاءً، فَقَالَ: عُمَرُ: لَا تُصَلِّ، فَقَالَ عَمَّارٌ: أَمَا تَذْكُرُ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذْ أَنَا وَأَنْتَ فِي سَرِيَّةٍ فَأَجْنَبْنَا فَلَمْ نَجِدْ مَاءً، فَأَمَّا أَنْتَ فَلَمْ تُصَلِّ، وَأَمَّا أَنَا فَتَمَعَّكْتُ فِي التُّرَابِ وَصَلَّيْتُ، فَلَمَّا أَتَيْنَا النَّبِيَّ ﷺ ذَكَرْتُ لَهُ ذَلِكَ، فَقَالَ: إِنَّمَا كَانَ يَكْفِيكَ "، وَضَرَبَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ بِيَدِهِ الْأَرْضَ ثُمَّ نَفَخَ، وَمَسَحَ بِهَا وَجْهَهُ وَكَفَّيْهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. al-Muthanná
  2. Muḥammad b. Jaʿfar
  3. Shuʿbah
  4. al-Ḥakam
  5. Dhar
  6. Ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. Abzá
  7. his father

✧ A man came to 'Umar, may Allah have mercy on him, and said, "I became junub and could not find water." 'Umar said, "Do not pray." 'Ammar said, "Do you not remember, O Commander of the Faithful, when you and I were on a military expedition and became junub and could not find water? As for you, you did not pray, but as for me, I rolled in the dust and prayed. When we came to the Prophet ﷺ, I mentioned that to him, and he said, 'It would have been enough for you to do this,' and the Prophet ﷺ struck the ground with his hand, then blew on it, and wiped his face and palms with it."

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Taḥāwī

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in مسند البزار, p. 1399
  • Mubarakpūri

    سنده حسن

    machine translationIts chain is good (ḥasan).

    in مسند البزار, p. 1399
  • Badr al-Dīn al-ʿAynī

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in مسند البزار, p. 1399
  • أبو الحسنات اللكنوي

    ما ذكره الطحاوي وارتضى به العيني في عمدة القاري من أن حديث عمار لا يصلح حجة في كون التيمم إلى الكوعين أو المرفقين أو المنكبين أو الإبطين لاضطرابه وفيه أن الاضطراب في هذا المقام غير مضر لكون روايات المرفقين والمنكبين مرجوحة ضعيفة بالنسبة إلى غيرها فسقط الاعتبار بها وروايات الآباط قصتها مقدمة على قصة روايات الكفين فلا تعارضها فبقيت روايات الكفين سالمة عن القدح والمعارضة انتهى كلام صاحب السعاية مختصرا

    machine translationWhat al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned, and al-ʿAynī accepted in ʿUmdat al-Qārī, is that the hadith of ʿAmmār is not fit to be used as evidence for tayammum extending to the wrists, or the elbows, or the shoulders, or the armpits, because of its inconsistency (iḍṭirāb). But the inconsistency here does no harm, because the narrations of the elbows and the shoulders are weaker and outweighed in comparison with the others, so they are discounted. As for the narrations of the armpits, their story came earlier than the story of the narrations of the two palms, so they do not conflict with it. Thus the narrations of the two palms remain free from criticism and conflict. End of the words of the author of al-Siʿāyah, abridged.

    in مسند البزار, p. 1399
Show 1 more
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    حديث عمار فورد بذكر الكفين في الصحيحين وبذكر المرفقين في السنن وفي رواية إلى نصف الذراع وفي رواية إلى الآباط فأما رواية المرفقين وكذا نصف الذراع ففيهما مقال وأما رواية الآباط فقال الشافعي وغيره مما تقدم ذكره مرارا ومما يقوي رواية الصحيحين في الاقتصار على الوجه والكفين

    machine translationAs for the hadith of ʿAmmār, it came with mention of the two palms in the two Ṣaḥīḥs, with mention of the elbows in the Sunan, in one narration up to half the forearm, and in another up to the armpits. The narrations of the elbows and likewise of half the forearm are open to criticism. As for the narration of the armpits, al-Shāfiʿī and others said what has been mentioned many times before. Among what strengthens the narration of the two Ṣaḥīḥs is that it limits tayammum to the face and the two palms.

    in مسند البزار, p. 1399

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. eminent, well-known Companion, among the earliest to embrace Islamd. 37 AH
    عَمَّار بْن يَاسِرصحابي جليل مشهور من السابقين الأولين
    فقال
  2. Young Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 70-odd AH
    أَبِيهِصحابي صغير
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 91 AH and 100 AH
    ابْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَىثقة
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. before the year 100 AH
    ذَرٍّثقة عابد
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), except that he sometimes practised concealment (tadlīs)d. 113 AH, or 114 AH, or 115; also said 110 AH
    الْحَكَمِثقة ثبت فقيه ، إلا أنه ربما دلس
    عن
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    نا
  7. Trustworthy (thiqah), his book was sound (ṣaḥīḥ al-kitāb), except that he had some heedlessness (ghaflah)d. 192 AH or 193 AH or 194 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍثقة صحيح الكتاب إلا أن فيه غفلة
    نا
  8. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 252 AH, also said: 250 AH, also said: 251 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّىثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  9. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us