MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 7592

✧ Comprehensive chapters on the alms of crops

Show the chain

( وَأَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو سَعِيدٍ، ثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ، ثَنَا الْحَسَنُ، ثَنَا يَحْيَى، ثَنَا ابْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ، عَنْ يُونُسَ، قَالَ:

سَأَلْتُ الزُّهْرِيَّ عَنْ زَكَاةِ الْأَرْضِ الَّتِي عَلَيْهَا الْجِزْيَةُ، فَقَالَ: لَمْ يَزَلِ الْمُسْلِمُونَ عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ وَبَعْدَهُ يُعَامِلُونَ عَلَى الْأَرْضِ، وَيَسْتَكْرُونَهَا، وَيُؤَدُّونَ الزَّكَاةَ مِمَّا خَرَجَ مِنْهَا فَنَرَى هَذِهِ الْأَرْضَ عَلَى نَحْوِ ذَلِكَ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Narrators

  1. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    الزُّهْرِيُّالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    سألت
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), except that in his narration from al-Zuhrī there are slight errors (awhām), and in his narration from others there is error (khaṭaʾ)d. Ibn Saʿd said: 152 AH, al-Bukhārī and others: 159 AH (and it is the correct view), Muḥammad b. ʿAzīz said: 160 AH
    يُونُسَثقة ، إلا أن في روايته عن الزهري وهما قليلا ، وفي غير الزهري خطأ
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh) and scholar, generous and a fighter in the way of God, in whom the qualities of goodness were gathered.d. 181 AH, or 182 AH
    ابْنُ الْمُبَارَكِثقة ثبت ، فقيه عالم ، جواد مجاهد ، جمعت فيه خصال الخير
    حدثنا
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), virtuous (fāḍil)d. 203 AH
    يَحْيَىثقة حافظ فاضل
    حدثنا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq)d. 270 AH
    الْحَسَنُصدوق
    حدثنا
  6. أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ
    حدثنا
  7. أَبُو سَعِيدٍ
    أخبرنا
  8. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us