MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 11748

✧ Condition of work in musaqah upon the worker

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ، ثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حَمْشَاذَ، ثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَيُّوبَ، أَنْبَأَ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ شَبِيبٍ، ثَنَا أَبِي، عَنْ يُونُسَ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، قَالَ:

لَمَّا خَرَجَ الْمُهَاجِرُونَ مِنْ مَكَّةَ إِلَى الْمَدِينَةِ وَلَيْسَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ شَيْءٌ، فَقَاسَمَتْهُمُ الْأَنْصَارُ عَلَى أَنْ أَعْطَوْهُمْ أَنْصَافَ ثِمَارِ أَمْوَالِهِمْ فِي كُلِّ عَامٍ عَلَى أَنْ يَكْفُوهُمُ الْمُؤْنَةَ وَالْعَمَلَ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    ابْنِ شِهَابٍالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), except that in his narration from al-Zuhrī there are slight errors (awhām), and in his narration from others there is error (khaṭaʾ)d. Ibn Saʿd said: 152 AH, al-Bukhārī and others: 159 AH (and it is the correct view), Muḥammad b. ʿAzīz said: 160 AH
    يُونُسَثقة ، إلا أن في روايته عن الزهري وهما قليلا ، وفي غير الزهري خطأ
    عن
  4. no harm in his hadith as narrated from him by his son Aḥmad, not as narrated by Ibn Wahbd. 186 AH
    أَبِيلا بأس بحديثه من رواية ابنه أحمد عنه ، لا من رواية ابن وهب
    حدثنا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq)d. 229 AH, in al-Nubl by al-Ḥāfiẓ Abū al-Qāsim: 239 AH
    أَحْمَدُ بْنُ شَبِيبٍصدوق
    أنبأ
  6. d. 294 AH, also said: 295 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَيُّوبَ
    حدثنا
  7. عَلِيُّ بْنُ حَمْشَاذَ
    حدثنا
  8. d. 403 AH, or 405 AH
    أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ
    أخبرنا
  9. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us