MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 419

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ التِّرْمِذِيُّ حَدَّثَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ عَنْ حُمْرَانَ مَوْلَى عُثْمَانَ

أَنَّهُ رَأَى عُثْمَانَ دَعَا بِإِنَاءٍ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Ibrāhīm b. Naṣr al-Tirmidhī
  2. Ibrāhīm b. Saʿd
  3. Ibn Shihāb
  4. ʿAṭāʾ b. Yazīd
  5. Ḥumrān a freed slave of ʿUthmān

✧ That he saw Uthman call for a vessel.

Notes

  • فَذَكَرَ نَحْوَهُ.

Grades by grader

DarussalamSahih (Darussalam) [, al-Bukhari (159) and Muslim (226)] Sahih hadeeth and it is repeat of the previous reportsunnah.com

Narrators

  1. One of the foremost early Muslims (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), one of the Four Caliphs, and one of the ten given glad tidings of Paradise (al-ʿashara al-mubashshara)d. 35 AH
    عُثْمَانُ بْنُ عَفَّانَأحد السابقين الأولين والخلفاء الأربعة ، والعشرة المبشرة
    أنه رأى
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. after the seventies, it is said 71 AH, also said 75 AH, also said 76 AH.
    حُمْرَانَ مَوْلَى عُثْمَانَثقة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 105 AH, or 107 AH
    عَطَاءِ بْنِ يَزِيدَثقة
    عن
  4. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    ابْنِ شِهَابٍالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah) and an authority (ḥujjah); he was spoken about without any valid ground for criticism.d. 182 AH, or 183 AH, or 184 AH, or 185 AH
    إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ سَعْدٍثقة حجة ، تُكُلِّم فيه بلا قادح
    حدثنا
  6. d. 234 AH or 236 AH
    إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ التِّرْمِذِيُّ
    حدثنا
  7. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us