MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 3577

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ عَنْ جَامِعٍ عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ

لَا يَمْنَعُ عَبْدٌ زَكَاةَ مَالِهِ، إِلَّا جُعِلَ لَهُ شُجَاعٌ أَقْرَعُ يَتْبَعُهُ يَفِرُّ مِنْهُ وَهُوَ يَتْبَعُهُ فَيَقُولُ: أَنَا كَنْزُكَ، ثُمَّ قَرَأَ عَبْدُ اللهِ مِصْدَاقَهُ فِي كِتَابِ اللهِ: سَيُطَوَّقُونَ مَا بَخِلُوا بِهِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Sufyān
  2. Jāmiʿ
  3. Abū Wāʾil
  4. ʿAbdullāh

✧ No servant withholds the zakah of his wealth except that a bald-headed serpent is made for him, following him, and he flees from it while it follows him, saying: “I am your treasure.” Then Abdullah recited its confirmation from the Book of Allah: “They will be collared with what they withheld with on the Day of Resurrection.”

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the earliest and foremost (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), and one of the leading scholars among the Companions; his virtues are manyd. 28 AH, or 32 AH, 33 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍمن السابقين الأولين ، ومن كبار العلماء من الصحابة ، مناقبه جمة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ said: 82 AH, Ibn Mandah said: 99 AH
    أَبِي وَائِلٍثقة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), excellent (fāḍil)d. between 121 AH and 130 AH
    جَامِعٍثقة فاضل
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an imam and a proof (ḥujjah), except that his memory changed towards the end of his life; he sometimes practiced concealment (tadlīs), but only from trustworthy narrators.d. 197 AH or 198 AH
    سُفْيَانُثقة حافظ فقيه , إمام حجة إلا أنه تغير حفظه بأخرة , وكان ربما دلس لكن عن الثقات
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us