MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 13228

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا وَهْبُ بْنُ جَرِيرٍ حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي قَالَ سَمِعْتُ ثَابِتًا الْبُنَانِيَّ يُحَدِّثُ عَنْ أَنَسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ

كَانَ يَعْرِضُ لَهُ الرَّجُلُ يَوْمَ الْجُمُعَةِ بَعْدَمَا يَنْزِلُ عَنِ الْمِنْبَرِ فَيُكَلِّمُهُ، ثُمَّ يَدْخُلُ فِي الصَّلَاةِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. And Hb b. Jarīr
  2. my father
  3. Thābit al-Bunānī Yuḥaddith
  4. Anas
  5. al-Nabī ﷺ

✧ A man would present himself to him on Friday after he came down from the pulpit and speak with him, then he would enter the prayer.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • al-Tirmidhi

    غريبلا نعرفه إلا من حديث جرير بن حازم

    machine translationStrange (gharīb): we do not know it except from the hadith of Jarīr b. Ḥāzim.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 13374
  • al-Bukhari

    وهم جرير بن حازم في هذا الحديث

    machine translationJarīr b. Ḥāzim erred (wahima) in this hadith.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 13374

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    يحدث عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 122 AH, or 123 AH, or 126 AH, or 127 AH, or 129 AH
    ثَابِتًا الْبُنَانِيَّثقة عابد
    سمعت
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), but there is weakness in his narrations from Qatādah, and he has errors (awhām) when he narrates from memoryd. 170 AH or 177 AH or 179 AH, also said: 167 AH
    أَبِيثقة ، لكن في حديثه عن قتادة ضعف ، وله أوهام إذا حدث من حفظه
    حدثنا
  4. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 206 AH, or 207 AH
    وَهْبُ بْنُ جَرِيرٍثقة
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us