MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Abi Ya'la 4711

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْأَعْلَى، حَدَّثَنَا يَزِيدُ بْنُ زُرَيْعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدٌ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ قَالَ: كَتَبْنَا إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ يَزِيدَ نَسْأَلُهُ عَنِ الرَّضَاعِ فَكَتَبَ إِنَّ شُرَيْحًا حَدَّثَ: أَنَّ عَلِيًّا وَابْنَ مَسْعُودٍ كَانَا يَقُولَانِ:

يُحَرِّمُ مِنَ الرَّضَاعَةِ قَلِيلُهُ وَكَثِيرُهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAbd al-Aʿlá
  2. Yazīd b. Zurayʿ
  3. Saʿīd
  4. Qatādah
  5. Katab.ā
  6. Ibrāhīm b. Yazīd Nasʾaluh
  7. al-Raḍāʿ Fakatab In Shurayḥ Ḥaddath
  8. ʿAlī and Ibn Masʿūd Kānā

✧ Little or much of suckling makes unlawful.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    حديث المصتان جاء أيضا من طرق صحيحة لكن قد قال بعضهم إنه مضطرب لأنه اختلف فيه هل هو عن عائشة أو عن الزبير أو عن ابن الزبير أو عن أم الفضل

    machine translationThe hadith of the two sucklings (al-maṣṣatān) has also come through authentic chains, but some have said that it is inconsistent (muḍṭarib), because there is disagreement over whether it is from ʿĀʾishah, or from al-Zubayr, or from Ibn al-Zubayr, or from Umm al-Faḍl.

    in مسند أبي يعلى الموصلي, p. 4711
  • Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyá b. Sharaf al-Nawawī

    واعترضت الشافعية على المالكية بحديث المصة والمصتان وأجابوا عنه بأجوبة باطلة لا ينبغي ذكرها لكن ننبه عليها خوفا من الاغترار بها منها أن بعضهم ادعى أنها منسوخة وهذا باطل لا يثبت بمجرد الدعوى ومنها أن بعضهم زعم أنه موقوف على عائشة وهذا خطأ فاحش بل قد ذكره مسلم وغيره من طرق صحاح مرفوعا من رواية عائشة ومن رواية أم الفضل ومنها أن بعضهم زعم أنه مضطرب وهذا غلط ظاهر وجسارة على رد السنن بمجرد الهوى وتوهين صحيحها لنصرة المذاهب

    machine translationThe Shāfiʿīs objected to the Mālikīs with the hadith of the single suckling and the two sucklings, and they answered it with false answers that should not be mentioned, but we point them out for fear that people be deceived by them. Among them is that some claimed it was abrogated, and this is false; it is not established by mere claim. Among them is that some alleged that it is a statement halted at ʿĀʾishah (mawqūf), and this is a gross error; rather, Muslim and others reported it through sound chains as a raised report (marfūʿ) from ʿĀʾishah and from Umm al-Faḍl. Among them is that some alleged that it is inconsistent (muḍṭarib), and this is an obvious mistake and a reckless rejection of the Sunnah by mere whim, and a weakening of what is authentic in order to support the schools of law.

    in مسند أبي يعلى الموصلي, p. 4711

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Mother of the Believers, the most knowledgeable woman in jurisprudence absolutely (afqah al-nisāʾ muṭlaqan)d. 57 AH, or 58 AH
    عَائِشَةُ بِنْتُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ الصِّدِّيقِأم المؤمنين ، أفقه النساء مطلقا
    حدثت
  2. trustworthy (thiqah) by agreementd. 82 AH, or 83 AH, or 85 AH
    سليم بن أسود المحاربيثقة باتفاق
    حدث
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), except that he often narrates with omission of the Companion (irsāl).d. 94 AH, or 95 AH, or 96 AH
    إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ يَزِيدَثقة إلا أنه يرسل كثيرا
    كتبنا إلى
  4. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 117 AH, or: 118 AH
    قَتَادَةَثقة ثبت
    عن
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), author of several works; however, he committed concealment (tadlīs) very often and his memory became confused (ikhtalaṭa), and he was among the most reliable of people in narrating from Qatādahd. 150 AH or 155 AH or 156 AH or 157 AH
    سَعِيدٌثقة حافظ ، له تصانيف ؛ لكنه كثير التدليس واختلط ، وكان من أثبت الناس في قتادة
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt).d. 182 AH, also said: 183 AH.
    يَزِيدُ بْنُ زُرَيْعٍثقة ثبت .
    حدثنا
  7. no harm in him (lā baʾs bih)d. Ibn Ḥajar said: 236 AH, or 237 AH, said by al-Bukhārī, or: 239 AH
    عَبْدُ الْأَعْلَىلا بأس به
    حدثنا
  8. أبو يعلى الموصلي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us