MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Abi Ya'la 1620

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا شَرِيكٌ، عَنِ الرُّكَيْنِ بْنِ الرَّبِيعِ، عَنْ نُعَيْمِ بْنِ حَنْظَلَةَ، عَنْ عَمَّارٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ - ﷺ قَالَ:

مَنْ كَانَ ذَا وَجْهَيْنِ فِي الدُّنْيَا كَانَ لَهُ لِسَانَانِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ مِنْ نَارٍ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Abū Bakr b. Abū Shaybah
  2. Sharīk
  3. al-Rukayn b. al-Rabīʿ
  4. Nuʿaym b. Ḥanẓalah
  5. ʿAmmār
  6. al-Nabī ﷺ

✧ Whoever has two faces in this world will have two tongues of fire on the Day of Resurrection.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • ʿAlī al-Madīnī

    إسناده حسن ولا نحفظه عن عمار عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إلا من هذا الطريق

    machine translationIts chain of transmission is good (ḥasan), and we do not know it from ʿAmmār from the Prophet ﷺ except through this route.

    in مسند أبي يعلى الموصلي, p. 1620

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. eminent, well-known Companion, among the earliest to embrace Islamd. 37 AH
    عَمَّار بْن يَاسِرصحابي جليل مشهور من السابقين الأولين
    عن
  2. acceptable (maqbūl)
    نُعَيْمِ بْنِ حَنْظَلَةَمقبول
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 131 AH
    الرُّكَيْنِ بْنِ الرَّبِيعِثقة
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq) who made many mistakes (yukhṭiʾ kathīran); his memory changed after he was appointed judge of Kufa; he was just, virtuous, devout, and severe against the people of innovation (ahl al-bidaʿ)d. 177 AH, or 178 AH
    شَرِيكٌصدوق يخطئ كثيرا , تغير حفظه منذ ولي القضاء بالكوفة ، وكان عادلا فاضلا عابدا شديدا على أهل البدع
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), author of works (ṣāḥib taṣānīf)d. 235 AH, or 234 AH
    أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَثقة حافظ ، صاحب تصانيف
    حدثنا
  6. أبو يعلى الموصلي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us