MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Tayalisi 120

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو دَاوُدَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ هُبَيْرَةَ، يُحَدِّثُ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ؓ، " أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ

كَانَ يُوقِظُ أَهْلَهُ فِي الْعَشْرِ الْأَوَاخِرِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Abū Dāwud
  2. Shuʿbah
  3. Abū Isḥāq
  4. Hubayrah Yuḥaddith
  5. ʿAlī
  6. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ He used to wake his family during the last ten nights.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Dāraquṭnī

    هذا وهم من محمد بن عرعرة رواه عن شعبة عن أبي إسحاق عن هبيرة عن سعد وغيره يرويه عن شعبة عن أبي إسحاق عن هبيرة عن علي وهو الصواب

    machine translationThis is an error (wahm) on the part of Muḥammad b. ʿArʿarah. He narrated it from Shuʿbah, from Abū Isḥāq, from Hubayrah, from Saʿd. Others narrate it from Shuʿbah, from Abū Isḥāq, from Hubayrah, from ʿAlī, and that is the correct version.

    in مسند الطيالسي, p. 120

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the ten (promised Paradise)d. 40 AH
    عَلِيُّ بْنُ أَبِي طَالِبٍأحد العشرة
    يحدث عن
  2. no harm in him (lā baʾsa bih), he was faulted for Shīʿismd. 66 AH
    هُبَيْرَةَلا بأس به ، وقد عيب بالتشيع
    سمعت
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), a prolific narrator (mukthir), devout (ʿābid); his memory became confused (ikhtalaṭa) at the end of his lifed. Ibn ʿUyaynah said 126 AH, Yaḥyā b. Saʿīd said 127 AH, Abū Nuʿaym said 128 AH, ʿAmr b. ʿAlī said 129 AH, Ibn Maʿīn said 132 AH
    أَبِي إِسْحَاقَثقة مكثر عابد , اختلط بآخره
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), who erred in some hadithsd. 203 AH, or 204 AH
    أَبُو دَاوُدَثقة حافظ , غلط في أحاديث

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us