MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 8716

✧ Mutallib b. Shu'ayb

Show the chain

وَبِهِ: حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ أَيُّوبَ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ حَسَّانَ، عَنِ الْحَسَنِ، عَنْ عِمْرَانَ بْنِ حُصَيْنٍ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ قَالَ:

قِيَامُ الرَّجُلِ فِي الصَّفِّ فِي سَبِيلِ اللهِ أَفْضَلُ مِنْ عِبَادَةِ سِتِّينَ سَنَةً

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Yaḥyá b. Ayyūb
  2. Hishām b. Ḥassān
  3. al-Ḥasan
  4. ʿImrān b. Ḥuṣayn
  5. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ A man's standing in the battle row in the cause of Allah is better than sixty years of worship.

Grades by grader

Abū ʿAbdullāh al-ḤākimSound Chain per Bukhārīin المعجم الأوسط, p. 8716hadithunlocked

Narrators

  1. embraced Islam in the year of Khaybar, accompanied the Prophet ﷺ, and was virtuousd. 52 AH, Ibn Mandah related a view that he died in the year (53) AH
    عِمْرَان بْن حُصَيْن بْن عُبَيْد بْن خَلَف الْخُزَاعِيّأسلم عام خيبر وصحب وكان فاضلا
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), virtuous and well known; he would often narrate with omission of the Companion (irsāl) and practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. 110 AH
    الْحَسَنِثقة فقيه ، فاضل مشهور ، وكان يرسل كثيرا ويدلس
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), among the most reliable of people in narrating from Ibn Sīrīn; there is some criticism of his narration from al-Ḥasan and ʿAṭāʾ, because it was said that he used to narrate from them by way of mursal transmission (irsāl).d. 146 AH, or 147 AH, or 148 AH
    هِشَامِ بْنِ حَسَّانَثقة من أثبت الناس في ابن سيرين ، وفي روايته عن الحسن وعطاء مقال لأنه قيل : كان يرسل عنهما
    عن
  4. truthful (ṣadūq), who sometimes erredd. 163 AH, 168 AH, also said 167 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنُ أَيُّوبَصدوق ربما أخطأ
    حدثنا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq) but made many mistakes; reliable (thabt) in his written book; there was heedlessness (ghaflah) in himd. 222 AH, or 223 AH
    عبد الله بن صالح المصريصدوق كثير الغلط ، ثبت في كتابه ، وكانت فيه غفلة
    نا
  6. مطلب بن شعيب بن حيان المروزي
    حدثنا
  7. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us