MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 8628

✧ Mas'ud b. Muhammad al-Ramli

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مَسْعُودُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الرَّمْلِيُّ، نَا عِمْرَانُ بْنُ هَارُونَ، ثَنَا ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَ، حَدَّثَنِي أَبُو الْأَسْوَدِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنِ الْقَاسِمِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ قَالَ:

لَوْ كُنْتُ رَاجِمًا لِأَحَدٍ بِلَا بَيِّنَةٍ لَرَجَمْتُ فُلَانَةَ لِمَا قَدْ ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا مِنَ الرِّيبَةِ فِي هَيْئَتِهَا، وَمَنْطِقِهَا، وَمَنْ يَدْخُلُ عَلَيْهَا

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Masʿūd b. Muḥammad al-Ramlī
  2. ʿImrān b. Hārūn
  3. Ibn Lahīʿah
  4. Abū al-Aswad Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Raḥman
  5. al-Qāsim b. Muḥammad
  6. Ibn ʿAbbās
  7. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ If I were to stone anyone without evidence, I would stone so-and-so because of what has appeared from her of suspicion in her appearance, her speech, and those who enter upon her.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 101 AH, or 102 AH, or 106 AH, or 107 AH, or 108 AH, or 109 AH, 112 AH, or 117 AH
    الْقَاسِمِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍثقة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 130-odd AH
    أَبُو الْأَسْوَدِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِثقة
    حدثني
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq); his memory became confused after his books were burned (khallaṭa baʿda iḥtirāq kutubihi); the narrations of Ibn al-Mubārak and Ibn Wahb from him are more sound than those of others.d. 173 AH, or 174 AH, also said 170 AH, also said 175 AH
    ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَصدوق ، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه ، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهما
    حدثنا
  5. عِمْرَانُ بْنُ هَارُونَ
    نا
  6. مسعود بن محمد الرملي
    حدثنا
  7. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us