MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 3608

✧ Zayd b. al-Marwazi Abu Habib al-Marwazi

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ الْمُهْتَدِي أَبُو حَبِيبٍ الْمَرُّوذِيُّ قَالَ: نَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ الطَّالْقَانِيُّ قَالَ: نَا عُمَرُ بْنُ هَارُونَ، عَنْ يُونُسَ بْنِ يَزِيدَ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ:

أُمِرْتُ بِالنَّعْلَيْنِ وَالْخَاتَمِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Zayd b. al-Muhtadī Abū Ḥabīb al-Marrūdhī
  2. Saʿīd b. Yaʿqūb al-Ṭālqānī
  3. ʿUmar b. Hārūn
  4. Yūnus b. Yazīd
  5. al-Zuhrī
  6. Anas
  7. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ I have been commanded to wear sandals and a ring.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    الزُّهْرِيِّالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), except that in his narration from al-Zuhrī there are slight errors (awhām), and in his narration from others there is error (khaṭaʾ)d. Ibn Saʿd said: 152 AH, al-Bukhārī and others: 159 AH (and it is the correct view), Muḥammad b. ʿAzīz said: 160 AH
    يُونُسَ بْنِ يَزِيدَثقة ، إلا أن في روايته عن الزهري وهما قليلا ، وفي غير الزهري خطأ
    عن
  4. abandoned (matrūk), though he was a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ)d. 194 AH
    عُمَرُ بْنُ هَارُونَمتروك وكان حافظا
    نا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a man of hadith (ṣāḥib ḥadīth)d. 240 AH or 244 AH
    سَعِيدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ الطَّالْقَانِيُّثقة ، صاحب حديث
    نا
  6. زَيْدُ بْنُ الْمُهْتَدِي أَبُو حَبِيبٍ الْمَرُّوذِيُّ
    حدثنا
  7. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us