MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan an-Nasa'i 5719

What Kind of Thickened Grape Juice is Permissible to Drink and What Kind is Not Permitte

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ أَبِي عَدِيٍّ عَنْ دَاوُدَ قَالَ

سَأَلْتُ سَعِيدًا مَا الشَّرَابُ الَّذِي أَحَلَّهُ عُمَرُ ؓ قَالَ الَّذِي يُطْبَخُ حَتَّى يَذْهَبَ ثُلُثَاهُ وَيَبْقَى ثُلُثُهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. al-Muthanná
  2. Ibn Abū ʿAdī
  3. Dāwud

"I asked Sa'eed: 'What is the drink that 'Umar bin Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, regarded as permissible?' He said: 'That which has been cooked until two-third has gone and one-third is left.'"

Grades by grader

Zubair Ali ZaiSoundfawazahmed0, hadithunlocked, sunnah.com
Abu GhuddahSahih Lighairihifawazahmed0
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānīSoundin سنن النسائي, p. 5734hadithunlocked
al-AlbaniSahihfawazahmed0

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Commander of the Faithful (amīr al-muʾminīn), well-known, of abundant virtues (jamm al-manāqib)d. 23 AH, also said: 24 AH
    عُمَر بْن الْخَطَّابأمير المؤمنين مشهور جم المناقب
    في حكم العنعنة
  2. One of the reliable (athbāt), eminent jurist scholarsd. 87 AH, or 93 AH, or 94 AH, or 95 AH, or 100 AH, Ibn Maʿīn and Ibn al-Madīnī said: 105 AH
    سعيد بن المسيبأحد العلماء الأثبات الفقهاء الكبار
    سألت
  3. Trustworthy and meticulous (thiqah mutqin), though he would make mistakes (yahim) toward the end of his lifed. 139 AH, or 140 AH, or: 141 AH, also said: 127 AH
    دَاوُدَثقة متقن ، كان يهم بآخره
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 192 AH, or 194 AH
    ابْنُ أَبِي عَدِيٍّثقة
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 252 AH, also said: 250 AH, also said: 251 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّىثقة ثبت
    أخبرنا
  6. the preserver (al-Ḥāfiẓ)d. 302 AH, or 303 AH
    النَّسَائِيُّالحافظ

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us