MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan an-Nasa'i 3678

Different Versions Of The Report Of Nu'man Bin Bashir Concerning Presents

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ حَاتِمٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا حِبَّانُ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ

أَنَّ بَشِيرًا أَتَى النَّبِيَّ ﷺ فَقَالَ يَا نَبِيَّ اللَّهِ نَحَلْتُ النُّعْمَانَ نِحْلَةً قَالَ أَعْطَيْتَ لإِخْوَتِهِ قَالَ لاَ قَالَ فَارْدُدْهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Ḥātim
  2. Ḥibbān
  3. ʿAbdullāh
  4. Hishām b. ʿUrwah
  5. his father

"O Prophet of Allah, I have given An-Nu'man a present." He said: "Have you given something to his brothers?" He said: "No." He said: "Then take it back."

Grades by grader

Zubair Ali ZaiSoundAnother source records this grader as “Hasan” (fawazahmed0).hadithunlocked, sunnah.com
Abu GhuddahSahihfawazahmed0
al-AlbaniSoundin صحيح سنن النسائي, p. 3680fawazahmed0, hadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. eminent Companion, veteran of Badrd. 11 AH, or 12 AH, or 13 AH
    بَشِير بْن سَعْد بْن ثَعْلَبَة الْخَزْرَجِيّصحابي جليل بدري
    أن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), well-known (mashhūr)d. 91 AH, or 92, or 93 AH, or 94 AH, or 95 AH, or 99 AH, or 100 AH, or 101 AH
    أَبِيهِثقة فقيه مشهور
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), sometimes practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. 145, or: 146 AH, or: 147 AH, also said: 144 AH
    هِشَامِ [١]بْنِ عُرْوَةَثقة فقيه ربما دلس
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh) and scholar, generous and a fighter in the way of God, in whom the qualities of goodness were gathered.d. 181 AH, or 182 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِثقة ثبت ، فقيه عالم ، جواد مجاهد ، جمعت فيه خصال الخير
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 231 AH or 232 AH or 233 AH
    حِبَّانُثقة
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah)d. close to 300 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ حَاتِمٍثقة
    أخبرنا
  7. the preserver (al-Ḥāfiẓ)d. 302 AH, or 303 AH
    النَّسَائِيُّالحافظ

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us