MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan Ibn Majah 2135

One who vows to go for Hajj walking

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ حُمَيْدِ بْنِ كَاسِبٍ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍو عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ قَالَ

رَأَى النَّبِيُّ ﷺ شَيْخًا يَمْشِي بَيْنَ ابْنَيْهِ فَقَالَ مَا شَأْنُ هَذَا قَالَ ابْنَاهُ نَذْرٌ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ قَالَ ارْكَبْ أَيُّهَا الشَّيْخُ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَنِيٌّ عَنْكَ وَعَنْ نَذْرِكَ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Yaʿqūb b. Ḥumayd b. Kāsib
  2. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz b. Muḥammad
  3. ʿAmr b. Abū ʿAmr
  4. al-Aʿraj
  5. Abū Hurayrah

"The Prophet ﷺ saw an old man walking between his two sons, and he said: What is the matter with him?' His sons said: 'A vow, O Messenger of Allah.' He said: 'Let this old man ride, for Allah has no need of you or your vow."'

Grades by grader

Zubair Ali ZaiSoundfawazahmed0, hadithunlocked, sunnah.com
Muhammad Fuad Abd al-BaqiSahihfawazahmed0
Shuayb al-ArnautSahihfawazahmed0
al-AlbaniSahihfawazahmed0

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. The illustrious Companion, the memorizer among the Companions (ḥāfiẓ al-ṣaḥābah)d. 57 AH, or: 58 AH, or: 59 AH
    أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ الدَّوْسِيُّالصحابي الجليل ، حافظ الصحابة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a scholar (ʿālim)d. 110 AH, or 117 AH, 119 AH
    الْأَعْرَجِثقة ثبت عالم
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), who sometimes erred (rubbamā wahima)d. after 150 AH, or 144 AH
    عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍوثقة ربما وهم
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq); he used to narrate from the books of others and would make mistakes.d. 182 AH, or 186 AH, or 187 AH, or 189 AH
    عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍصدوق ، كان يحدث من كتب غيره فيخطئ
    حدثنا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq), sometimes had lapses (wahm).d. 240 AH, or 241 AH
    يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ حُمَيْدِ بْنِ كَاسِبٍصدوق ، ربما وهم .
    حدثنا
  6. one of the imams, a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ)d. 273 AH, or: 275 AH
    ابْنُ مَاجَهْأحد الأئمة ، حافظ

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us