MajelisNoteDalilدليل
العربية

Sahih Ibn Hibban 3306

✧ Zakat al-Fitr

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ خُزَيْمَةَ فِيمَا انْتَخَبْتُ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِتَابِ الْكَبِيرِ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ الدَّوْرَقِيُّ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ عُلَيَّةَ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ حَكِيمِ بْنِ حِزَامٍ عَنْ عِيَاضِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي سَرْحٍ قَالَ

قَالَ أَبُو سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيُّ وَذَكَرُوا عِنْدَهُ صَدَقَةَ رَمَضَانَ فَقَالَ «لَا أُخْرِجُ إِلَّا مَا كُنْتُ أُخْرِجُ فِي عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ صَاعَ تَمْرٍ أَوْ صَاعَ حِنْطَةٍ أَوْ صَاعَ شَعِيرٍ أَوْ صَاعَ أَقِطٍ» فَقَالَ لَهُ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْقَوْمِ أَوْ مُدَّيْنِ مِنْ قَمْحٍ؟ فَقَالَ «لَا تِلْكَ قِيمَةُ مُعَاوِيَةَ لَا أَقْبَلُهَا وَلَا أَعْمَلُ بِهَا»

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Isḥāq b. Khuzaymah Fīmā Āntakhabt ʿAlayh Min Kitāb al-Kabīr
  2. Yaʿqūb b. Ibrāhīm al-Dawraqī
  3. Ibn ʿUlayyah
  4. Muḥammad b. Isḥāq
  5. ʿAbdullāh b. ʿAbdullāh b. ʿUthmān b. Ḥakīm b. Ḥizām
  6. ʿIyāḍ b. ʿAbdullāh b. Abū Sarḥ

✧ Abu Sa'id al-Khudri said, when they mentioned to him the sadaqah of Ramadan: 'I will not give except what I used to give during the time of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ: a sa' of dates, or a sa' of wheat, or a sa' of barley, or a sa' of aqt.' A man from the people said to him: 'Or two mudds of wheat?' He said: 'No, those are the values of Mu'awiya. I do not accept them and I will not act upon them.'

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautGood-Soundhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Khuzaymah

    ذكر الحنطة في خبر أبي سعيد غير محفوظ ولا أدري ممن الوهم

    machine translationThe mention of wheat (ḥinṭah) in the report of Abū Saʿīd is not preserved (ghayr maḥfūẓ), and I do not know from whom the error came.

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
  • Abū Daʾūd

    ذكر الحنطة فيه غير محفوظ وذكر الدقيق وهم من ابن عيينة

    machine translationThe mention of wheat (ḥinṭah) in it is not preserved (ghayr maḥfūẓ), and the mention of flour is an error (wahm) from Ibn ʿUyaynah.

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
  • Ibn Khuzaymah

    قال ابن خزيمة ذكر الحنطة في هذا الخبر غير محفوظ ولا أدري ممن الوهم وقول الرجل أو مدين دال على أن ذكر الحنطة في أول الخبر خطأ ووهم إذ لو كان صحيحا لم يكن لقوله أو مدين من قمح معنى

    machine translationIbn Khuzaymah said: The mention of wheat (ḥinṭah) in this report is not preserved (ghayr maḥfūẓ), and I do not know from whom the error came. The man's saying "or two mudds" indicates that the mention of wheat at the beginning of the report is a mistake and an error, for had it been correct, his saying "or two mudds of wheat" would have had no meaning.

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
  • Ibn Khuzaymah

    ذكر الحنطة في هذا الخبر غير محفوظ

    machine translationThe mention of wheat (ḥinṭah) in this report is not preserved (ghayr maḥfūẓ).

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
Show 4 more
  • Abū Daʾūd

    ذكر فيه رجل واحد عن ابن علية أو صاعا من حنطة وليس بمحفوظ

    machine translationOne man mentioned in it, from Ibn ʿUlayyah, "or a ṣāʿ of wheat (ḥinṭah)," and it is not preserved (laysa bi-maḥfūẓ).

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
  • Abū Daʾūd

    ذكر فيه رجل واحد عن ابن علية أو صاع من حنطة وليس بمحفوظ

    machine translationOne man mentioned in it, from Ibn ʿUlayyah, "or a ṣāʿ of wheat (ḥinṭah)," and it is not preserved (laysa bi-maḥfūẓ).

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
  • Abū Daʾūd

    إن هذا ليس بمحفوظ يعني قوله أو صاعا من حنطة

    machine translationThis is not preserved (laysa bi-maḥfūẓ), meaning his saying "or a ṣāʿ of wheat (ḥinṭah)."

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311
  • Ibn Khuzaymah

    ذكر الحنطة في هذا الخبر غير محفوظ ولا أدري ممن الوهم وقول الرجل له أو مدين من قمح دال على أن ذكر الحنطة في أول الخبر خطأ ووهم إذ لو كان صحيحا إذ لم يكن لقوله أو مدين من قمح معنى

    machine translationThe mention of wheat (ḥinṭah) in this report is not preserved (ghayr maḥfūẓ), and I do not know from whom the error came. The man's saying to him "or two mudds of wheat (qamḥ)" indicates that the mention of wheat at the beginning of the report is a mistake and an error, for had it been correct, his saying "or two mudds of wheat" would have had no meaning.

    in صحيح ابن حبان, p. 3311

Narrators

  1. Muʿāwiyah b. Abī Sufyān
    Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 60 AH, also said: 59 AH
    مُعَاوِيَة بْن أَبِي سُفْيَانصحابي
    في حكم العنعنة
  2. Abū Saʿīd al-Khudrī
    He and his father were Companions (ṣuḥbah).d. 63 AH, or 64 AH, or 65 AH, or 74 AH
    أبو سعيد الخدريله ولأبيه صحبة
    في حكم العنعنة
  3. ʿIyāḍ b. ʿAbdillāh
    trustworthy (thiqah)d. at the turn of 100 AH
    عِيَاضِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ أَبِي سَرْحٍثقة
    عن
  4. ʿAbdullāh b. ʿAbdullāh b. ʿUthmān b. Ḥakīm b. Ḥizām
    acceptable (maqbūl)
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ حَكِيمِ بْنِ حِزَامٍمقبول
    حدثني
  5. Muḥammad b. Isḥāq
    Truthful (ṣadūq), he practiced concealment (yudallis), and was accused of Shiʿism (tashayyuʿ) and of belief in free will (qadar)d. ʿAmr b. ʿAlī said, and Ibrāhīm b. Muḥammad b. ʿArafah: 150 AH, Muḥammad b. Saʿd said elsewhere: al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said: 151 AH, he said: and his son said: 150 AH. Aḥmad b. Khālid al-Wahbī said: 151 AH, Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn said, and ʿAlī Ibn al-Madīnī, and Zakariyyā b. Yaḥyā al-Sājī: 152 AH, khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ said: 153 AH, 152 AH
    مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَصدوق يدلس ، ورمي بالتشيع والقدر
    عن
  6. Ismāʿīl
    trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 193 AH, or 194 AH
    ابْنُ عُلَيَّةَثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  7. Yaʿqūb b. Ibrāhīm
    trustworthy (thiqah)d. 252 AH.
    يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ الدَّوْرَقِيُّثقة .
    حدثنا
  8. Ibn Khuzaymah
    d. 311 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ خُزَيْمَةَ
    أخبرنا
  9. Ibn Ḥibbān
    d. 354 AH
    ابن حبان

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us