MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan ad-Darimi 3307

✧ The Will for the Wealthy

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا سُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ عَنْ حُمَيْدٍ عَنْ الْحَسَنِ

سُئِلَ عَنْ رَجُلٍ أَوْصَى وَلَهُ أَخٌ مُوسِرٌ أَيُوصِي لَهُ؟ قَالَ «نَعَمْ وَإِنْ كَانَ رَبَّ عِشْرِينَ أَلْفًا» ثُمَّ قَالَ «وَإِنْ كَانَ رَبَّ مِائَةِ أَلْفٍ فَإِنَّ غِنَاهُ لَا يَمْنَعُهُ الْحَقَّ»

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Sulaymān b. Ḥarb
  2. Ḥammād b. Salamah
  3. Ḥumayd
  4. al-Ḥasan

✧ About a man who left a will, and he had a wealthy brother. Should he leave a will for him? He said, "Yes, even if his wealth is twenty thousand (dirhams)." Then he said, "And if his wealth is one hundred thousand, surely his richness will not prevent him from giving his brother his rights."

Grades by grader

Ḥasan Salīm Asad al-DārānīSound Chainhadithunlocked

Narrators

  1. Trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), virtuous and well known; he would often narrate with omission of the Companion (irsāl) and practiced concealment (tadlīs)d. 110 AH
    الْحَسَنُ الْبَصْرِيُّثقة فقيه ، فاضل مشهور ، وكان يرسل كثيرا ويدلس
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), a concealer of defects in transmission (mudallis); Zāʾidah faulted him for involving himself in some of the affairs of the rulers.d. at the beginning of Abū Jaʿfar's caliphate, the year 140 AH, or 142 AH, or 143 AH.
    حُمَيْدٍثقة مدلس ، وعابه زائدة لدخوله في شيء من أمر الأمراء.
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid), the most reliable of people in narrating from Thābit; his memory changed towards the end of his lifed. 167 AH, or 165 AH.
    حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَثقه عابد ، أثبت الناس في ثابت ، وتغير حفظه بآخره
    حدثنا
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), an imam, a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ).d. 222 AH, 223 AH, or 224 AH, also said 227 AH
    سُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ حَرْبٍثقة إمام حافظ
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), excellent (fāḍil), meticulous (mutqin)d. 254 AH, or 255 AH, also said: 250 AH
    الدارميثقة ، فاضل ، متقن

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us