MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan al-Daraqutni 726

✧ The Concession for Wiping Over the Khuffayn and What Pertains to It and the Differences in Narrations

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا الْحُسَيْنُ نا ابْنُ حَنَّانٍ قَالَ الشَّيْخُ ابْنُ حَنَّانٍ هُوَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَمْرِو بْنِ حَنَّانٍ الْحِمْصِيُّ ثنا بَقِيَّةُ نا سَعِيدُ بْنُ بَشِيرٍ عَنْ قَتَادَةَ عَنْ أَبِي قِلَابَةَ عَنْ رَجَاءِ بْنِ عَامِرٍ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَبَا ذَرٍّ يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ

الصَّعِيدُ الطَّيِّبُ وُضُوءٌ وَلَوْ عَشْرَ سِنِينَ فَإِذَا وَجَدْتَ الْمَاءَ فَامْسَسْهُ جِلْدَكَ كَذَا قَالَ رَجَاءُ بْنُ عَامِرٍ وَالصَّوَابُ رَجُلٌ مِنْ بَنِي عَامِرٍ كَمَا قَالَ ابْنُ عُلَيَّةَ عَنْ أَيُّوبَ بَابُ جَوَازِ التَّيَمُّمِ لِصَاحِبِ الْجَرَّاحِ مَعَ اسْتِعْمَالِ الْمَاءِ وَتَعْصِيبِ الْجَرْحِ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 31 AH, or: 32 AH
    أَبُو ذَرٍّ الْغِفَارِيُّالصحابي
    سمع
  2. رجاء بن عامر
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), excellent, who often narrated mursal reports (kathīr al-irsāl)d. 104 AH, or 105 AH, or 106 AH, or 107 AH
    أَبِي قِلَابَةَثقة فاضل ، كثير الإرسال
    عن
  4. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 117 AH, or: 118 AH
    قَتَادَةَثقة ثبت
    عن
  5. weak (ḍaʿīf)d. 168 AH or 169 AH or 170 AH
    سَعِيدُ بْنُ بَشِيرٍضعيف
    حدثنا
  6. truthful (ṣadūq), frequently practises concealment (tadlīs) from weak narratorsd. Ibn Saʿd said, and more than one: died (197) AH, Isḥāq b. Ibrāhīm b. al-ʿAlāʾ said: 198 AH; Abū Sulaymān b. Zabr said: 199 AH; Ibn Ḥibbān said: 190 AH
    بَقِيَّةُصدوق ، كثير التدليس عن الضعفاء
    حدثنا
  7. truthful (ṣadūq) but narrates unfamiliar reports (yughrib)d. 257 AH, or before it
    ابْنُ حَنَانٍصدوق يغرب
    حدثنا
  8. الْحُسَيْنُ
    حدثنا
  9. الدارقطني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us