MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan al-Daraqutni 3358

Show the chain

نا إِسْمَاعِيلُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الصَّفَّارُ نا الْعَبَّاسُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الدُّورِيُّ نا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ يُونُسَ نا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ عَيَّاشٍ عَنْ أَبِي سَعْدٍ عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ

جَعَلَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ دِيَةَ الْعَامِرِيَّيْنِ دِيَةَ الْمُسْلِمِ

Notes

  • قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ كَأَنَّ كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا دِيَةُ الْمُسْلِمِ كَانَ لَهُمَا عَهْدٌ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
    عِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
    عن
  3. weak (ḍaʿīf), a concealer of defects (mudallis)d. after 140 AH
    أَبِي سَعْدٍضعيف مدلس
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah) and devout, except that his memory deteriorated when he grew old; his book is sound (ṣaḥīḥ).d. 192 AH, or: 193 AH, or: 194 AH
    أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ عَيَّاشٍثقة عابد ، إلا أنه لما كبر ساء حفظه ، وكتابه صحيح
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 227 AH
    أَحْمَدُ بْنُ يُونُسَثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 271 AH
    الْعَبَّاسُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الدُّورِيُّثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  7. إِسْمَاعِيلُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الصَّفَّارُ
    حدثنا
  8. الدارقطني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us