MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan al-Daraqutni 295

✧ Wiping Three Times

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا جَعْفَرُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ نا مُوسَى نا أَبُو بَكْرٍ نا حَفْصُ بْنُ غِيَاثٍ عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍ عَنْ زِيَادٍ قَالَ قَالَ عَلِيٌّ

مَا أُبَالِي لَوْ بَدَأْتُ بِالشِّمَالِ قَبْلَ الْيَمِينِ إِذَا تَوَضَّأْتُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Jaʿfar b. Muḥammad
  2. Mūsá
  3. Abū Bakr
  4. Ḥafṣ b. Ghiyāth
  5. Ismāʿīl b. Abū Khālid
  6. Ziyād
  7. ʿAlī

✧ I do not care if I began with the left before the right when I performed ablution.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr

    ضعفوا الحديث المذكور عن علي وابن مسعود وقالوا هذا منقطع لا يصح

    machine translationThey graded the mentioned hadith from ʿAlī and Ibn Masʿūd as weak (ḍaʿīf), and they said: this is broken in its chain (munqaṭiʿ) and is not authentic.

    in سنن الدارقطني, p. 297
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    وفيه انقطاع

    machine translationAnd in it is a break in the chain (inqiṭāʿ).

    in سنن الدارقطني, p. 297

Narrators

  1. One of the ten (promised Paradise)d. 40 AH
    عَلِيُّ بْنُ أَبِي طَالِبٍأحد العشرة
    قال
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 135 AH
    زِيَادٍثقة عابد
    عن
  3. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 136 AH, or 145 AH, or 146 AH, or 148 AH
    إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍثقة ثبت
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), whose memory changed slightly toward the end of his lifed. 194 AH, also said: 195 AH, or 196 AH
    حَفْصُ بْنُ غِيَاثٍثقة فقيه ، تغير حفظه قليلا في الآخر
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), author of works (ṣāḥib taṣānīf)d. 235 AH, or 234 AH
    أَبُو بَكْرٍثقة حافظ ، صاحب تصانيف
    حدثنا
  6. مُوسَى
    حدثنا
  7. جَعْفَرُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ
    حدثنا
  8. الدارقطني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us