MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 7401

✧ Abu Imran al-Jawni on the authority of Anas

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ حَبِيبِ بْنِ عَدِيٍّ، نَا خَالِدُ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ، نَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ ;

أَنَّ امْرَأَةً يَهُودِيَّةً أَتَتِ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ بِشَاةٍ مَسْمُومَةٍ فَأَكَلَ مِنْهَا فَجِيءَ بِهَا فَقِيلَ: أَلَا تَقْتُلُهَا، أَوْ أَلَا نَقْتُلُهَا، قَالَ: لَا، قَالَ: فَمَا زِلْتُ أَعْرِفُهَا فِي لَهَوَاتِ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Yaḥyá b. Ḥabīb b. ʿAdī
  2. Khālid b. al-Ḥārith
  3. Shuʿbah
  4. Hishām b. Zayd
  5. Anas

✧ A Jewish woman brought the Prophet ﷺ a poisoned sheep, and he ate from it. She was brought, and it was said: 'Will you not kill her, or shall we kill her?' He said: 'No.' He said: 'I continued to recognize its effect in the palate of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.'

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī

    اختلف الروايات في قتلها وما روي عن أنس أصح

    machine translationThe narrations differ regarding her killing, and what is narrated from Anas is more authentic (aṣaḥḥ).

    in مسند البزار, p. 7401

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 101 and 120 AH, or between 121 and 130 AH
    هِشَامِ بْنِ زَيْدٍثقة
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    نا
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt).d. 186 AH.
    خَالِدُ بْنُ الْحَارِثِثقة ثبت.
    نا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 248 AH, also said: after 250 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنُ حَبِيبِ بْنِ عَدِيٍّثقة
    حدثنا
  6. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us