MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 6897

✧ The Basrans from Anas

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ أَخْزَمَ، نَا أَبُو دَاوُدَ، نَا الْحَكَمُ بْنُ عَطِيَّةَ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ:

يُسَمُّونَهُمْ مُحَمَّدًا، ثُمَّ يَسُبُّونَهُمْ ؟!

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Zayd b. Akhzam
  2. Abū Dāwud
  3. al-Ḥakam b. ʿAṭiyyah
  4. Thābit
  5. Anas
  6. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ They name them Muhammad, then they insult them?!

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Badr al-Dīn al-ʿAynī

    الحكم هذا ضعيف ذكره البخاري في الضعفاء قال وكان أبو الوليد يضعفه

    machine translationThis al-Ḥakam is weak (ḍaʿīf). al-Bukhārī mentioned him in al-Ḍuʿafāʾ (the weak narrators) and said: Abū al-Walīd used to regard him as weak.

    in مسند البزار, p. 6897
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    سنده لين

    in مسند البزار, p. 6897
  • Ṭabarī

    ضعيف لأنه من رواية الحكم بن عطية عن ثابت عنه

    machine translationWeak (ḍaʿīf), because it is from the narration of al-Ḥakam b. ʿAṭiyyah, from Thābit, from him.

    in مسند البزار, p. 6897

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 122 AH, or 123 AH, or 126 AH, or 127 AH, or 129 AH
    ج١٣ / ص٣٠٤ثَابِتٍثقة عابد
    عن
  3. truthful (ṣadūq), has some lapses (awhām)
    الْحَكَمُ بْنُ عَطِيَّةَصدوق ، له أوهام
    نا
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), who erred in some hadithsd. 203 AH, or 204 AH
    أَبُو دَاوُدَثقة حافظ , غلط في أحاديث
    نا
  5. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 257 AH
    زَيْدُ بْنُ أَخْزَمَثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  6. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us