MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 6755

✧ The Basrans from Anas

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، نَا عَبْدُ الْأَعْلَى، عَنْ خَالِدٍ الْحَذَّاءِ، عَنْ بَكْرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ الْمُزَنِيِّ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ ;

أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ أَهَلَّ بِالْحَجِّ وَالْعُمْرَةِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAmr b. ʿAlī
  2. ʿAbd al-Aʿlá
  3. Khālid al-Ḥadhhāʾ
  4. Bakr b. ʿAbdullāh al-Muzanī
  5. Anas

✧ The Prophet ﷺ entered ihram for Hajj and Umrah.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī

    تعقب سليمان بن حرب بأن قتادة وغيره من الحفاظ رووه عن أنس كذلك فالاختلاف فيه على أنس نفسه قال فلعله سمع النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يعلم غيره كيف يهل بالقران فظن أنه أهل عن نفسه

    machine translationSulaymān b. Ḥarb objected that Qatādah and other memorizers (ḥuffāẓ) narrated it from Anas in the same way, so the disagreement concerns Anas himself. He said: Perhaps he heard the Prophet ﷺ teaching someone else how to declare the intention for Qirān (combining ḥajj and ʿumrah), and so he thought that he was declaring it for himself.

    in مسند البزار, p. 6755

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), firmly established (thabt), eminent (jalīl).d. 106 AH or 108 AH
    بَكْرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ الْمُزَنِيِّثقة ثبت جليل
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah); he narrates with omission of the intermediary (yursil).d. 141 AH, or 142 AH, or more.
    خَالِدٍ الْحَذَّاءِثقة يرسل.
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 184 AH, or: 187 AH, or: 189 AH
    عَبْدُ الْأَعْلَىثقة
    نا
  5. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 249 AH
    عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  6. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us