MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 6283

✧ al-Zuhri from him

Show the chain

6283 6281 -

وَنَاهُ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مِسْكِينٍ، نَا عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ صَالِحٍ، نَا اللَّيْثُ، حَدَّثَنِي يُونُسُ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ بِنَحْوِ حَدِيثِ ابْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ

Translation

✧ And it was narrated to us by Muhammad b. Miskin: Abd Allah b. Salih narrated to us: al-Layth narrated to us: Yunus narrated to me, from Ibn Shihab, from Anas b. Malik, from the Prophet ﷺ with something similar to the hadith of Ibn ʿUyaynah.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    الزهريالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), except that in his narration from al-Zuhrī there are slight errors (awhām), and in his narration from others there is error (khaṭaʾ)d. Ibn Saʿd said: 152 AH, al-Bukhārī and others: 159 AH (and it is the correct view), Muḥammad b. ʿAzīz said: 160 AH
    يونس بن يزيدالأيليثقة ، إلا أن في روايته عن الزهري وهما قليلا ، وفي غير الزهري خطأ
    حدثني
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), a well-known imamd. 175 AH, or 176 AH, or 177 AH
    الليث بن سعدثقة ثبت ، فقيه إمام مشهور
    نا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq) but made many mistakes; reliable (thabt) in his written book; there was heedlessness (ghaflah) in himd. 222 AH, or 223 AH
    عبد الله بن صالح المصريصدوق كثير الغلط ، ثبت في كتابه ، وكانت فيه غفلة
    نا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 289 AH
    محمد بن مسكين بن نميلة اليماميثقة
    نا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us