MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 5834

Show the chain

5834 5829 -

وَنَاهُ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ عَبْدَةَ، أَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ أَيُّوبَ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ بِنَحْوِهِ، أَوْ قَرِيبًا مِنْهُ

Translation

✧ And Ahmad b. 'Abda narrated to us, Hammad b. Zayd informed us, from Ayyub, from Nafi', from Ibn Umar, in a similar manner, or close to it.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Zarqānī

    دعوى أن رواية يوما شاذة لا تسمع مع إمكان الجمع

    machine translationThe claim that the narration of "a day" is anomalous (shādhdh) is not to be heard, since reconciling the narrations is possible.

    in مسند البزار, p. 5834

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most often, and one of the ʿAbādilah; he was among the people most strict in following the narrations (athar).d. 72 AH, or 73 AH, or 74 AH, also said: 75 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِأحد المكثرين من الصحابة والعبادلة ، وكان من أشد الناس اتباعا للأثر
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a well-known jurist (faqīh)d. 116 AH, or 117 AH, or 118 AH, or 119 AH, or 120 AH
    نافع مولى ابن عمرثقة ثبت فقيه مشهور
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), an authority (ḥujjah), one of the leading jurists and devout worshippersd. 130 AH, or 131 AH, or 132 AH, also said: 124 AH, also said: 125 AH, also said: 129 AH
    أيوب السختيانيثقة ثبت حجة ، من كبار الفقهاء العباد
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh).d. 177 AH, also said 179 AH
    حماد بن زيدثقة ثبت ، فقيه.
    أنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), accused of nasb (hostility toward ʿAlī and the Ahl al-Bayt)d. 245 AH
    أحمد بن عبدة الضبيثقة ، رمي بالنصب
    نا
  6. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us