MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 4238

Show the chain

وَحَدَّثَنَاهُ عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ شَبُّوَيْهِ الْمَرْوَزِيُّ، قَالَ: نَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عِمْرَانَ بْنِ أَبِي لَيْلَى، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي لَيْلَى، وَهُوَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ عَوْنِ بْنِ أَبِي جُحَيْفَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ - ؓ

أَنَّهُ خَرَجَ مَعَ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ مِنَ الْمَدِينَةِ إِلَى مَكَّةَ فَلَمْ يَزَلْ يُصَلِّي رَكْعَتَيْنِ رَكْعَتَيْنِ حَتَّى رَجَعَ إِلَى بَيْتِهِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAbdullāh b. Aḥmad b. Shabbūwayh al-Marwazī
  2. Muḥammad b. ʿImrān b. Abū Laylá
  3. his father
  4. Ibn Abū Laylá / Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Raḥman
  5. ʿAwn b. Abū Juḥayfah
  6. his father

✧ He went out with the Messenger of Allah ﷺ from Madinah to Makkah, and he continued praying two rak'ahs, two rak'ahs, until he returned to his house.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • أبو علي الطوسي كردوش

    حسن صحيح قال مغلطاي وليس هذا منه تصحيحا لحديث حجاج إنما أراد تصحيح حديث أبي جحيفة في نفس الأمر وكذلك هو صحيح الأصل

    machine translationGood and sound (ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ). Mughulṭāy said: This is not a declaration of soundness for the ḥadīth of Ḥajjāj; rather he meant to declare sound the ḥadīth of Abū Juḥayfah in itself, and likewise it is sound in its origin.

    in مسند البزار, p. 4238

Narrators

  1. well-known Companiond. 74 AH
    وَهْبُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ السُّوَائِيُّصحابي معروف
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 116 AH, khalīfah said: died at the end of Khālid's governorship over Iraq.
    عَوْنِ بْنِ أَبِي جُحَيْفَةَثقة
    عن
  3. truthful (ṣadūq), of very poor memoryd. 148 AH
    ابْنِ أَبِي لَيْلَى ، وَهُوَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِصدوق ، سيئ الحفظ جدا
    عن
  4. acceptable (maqbūl)d. between 181 and 190 AH
    أَبِيهِمقبول
    عن
  5. truthful (ṣadūq)d. 228 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عِمْرَانَ بْنِ أَبِي لَيْلَىصدوق
    نا
  6. d. 256 AH, also said: 275 AH, which is unlikely
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ شَبُّوَيْهِ الْمَرْوَزِيُّ
    حدثنا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us