MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 3775

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ قَالَ: نَا أَبُو الْأَسْوَدِ قَالَ: نَا ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ زِيَادٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ جَزْءٍ ؓ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ قَالَ:

لَوَدِدْتُ أَنَّ بَيْنِيَ وَبَيْنَ أَهْلِ نَجْرَانَ حِجَابًا مِنْ شِدَّةِ مَا كَانُوا يُجَادِلُونَهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Isḥāq
  2. Abū al-Aswad
  3. Ibn Lahīʿah
  4. Sulaymān b. Ziyād
  5. ʿAbdullāh b. al-Ḥārith b. Jazʾ
  6. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ I would love that there be a barrier between me and the people of Najran because of how intensely they used to argue with him.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū al-Ḥasan Nur al-Dīn ʿAlī b. Abi Bakr al-Haythamī

    وفيه ابن لهيعة وحديثه حسن

    machine translationIt contains Ibn Lahīʿah, and his hadith is good (ḥasan).

    in مسند البزار, p. 3775

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 86 AH, also said: 85 AH, also said: 87 AH, also said: 88 AH, also said: killed at al-Yamāmah, and this is questionable
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ جَزْءٍ الزُّبَيْدِيّصحابي
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 116 AH, or 117 AH, or 118 AH
    سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ زِيَادٍثقة
    عن
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq); his memory became confused after his books were burned (khallaṭa baʿda iḥtirāq kutubihi); the narrations of Ibn al-Mubārak and Ibn Wahb from him are more sound than those of others.d. 173 AH, or 174 AH, also said 170 AH, also said 175 AH
    ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَصدوق ، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه ، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهما
    نا
  4. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 219 AH
    أَبُو الْأَسْوَدِثقة
    نا
  5. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 270 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  6. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us